Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
Published on: November 5, 2020
Comparison of molecular detection PCR methods for chequa iflavirus in freshwater crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus
Kitikarn Sakuna1, Jennifer Elliman2, Leigh Owens2
1College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia; Faculty of Veterinary Science, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya, 80240, Thailand.
Abstract:
Chequa iflavirus (+ve sense ssRNA virus) infects redclaw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) and it may cause mortality reaching 20-40% after about three weeks following stress. The sequence of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase at nucleotide position 8383-9873 was used for developing and comparing PCR-based detection protocols. The reverse transcription, quantitative, polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was specific against nine Picornavirales and crustacean viruses and its' measurement of uncertainty (0.07-1.37) was similar to PCRs for other crustacean viruses. In vitro, the reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) read at 60min had poor repeatability for a linearized plasmid with an iflavirus insert when compared with RT-PCR visualised on an electrophoretic gel and RT-qPCR; both sensitive to 102 copies. In a limited, comparative sample of clinical crayfish haemolymph, the lowest, non-zero copies were 2.88×104 for RT-PCR and 4.60×101 for the RT-qPCR. In 68 further clinical crayfish haemolymph samples tested by RT-qPCR only, copy numbers ranged from 0 to 1.14×106. For RT-qPCR, the amplification plots, melt curves and the CT values indicated that the CT above 34.0 is a potential negative result but examination of the melt curve is necessary for an accurate interpretation. A suggested program of testing for crayfish farmers would consist of non-destructive bleeding, labelling of crayfish and screening with RT-qPCR. Only those crayfish nominally negative (below detectable limits) would be used for broodstock or selective breeding.

