Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

287
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
287
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

70.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
70.2K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

68.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
68.5K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

463
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
463
Natural and Artificial Concepts01:24

Natural and Artificial Concepts

595
In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint...
595
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

1.6K
Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraoperative hypotension did not have an impact on the development of adverse outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study.

Journal of anesthesia·2026
Same author

The occurrence of a particular state is a predictor of successful travel consultation.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Reply to Mahida et al.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Single-stage concomitant extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis and enucleation of a left recurrent laryngeal nerve schwannoma via median sternotomy.

General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases·2026
Same author

Spacing of a TNF inhibitor or dose reduction of methotrexate vs continued treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity: a randomised, controlled trial (SORAIRO trial).

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2026
Same author

Circumferential Extramural Spread of Tracheal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Causing Unexpected Positive Margin.

Respirology case reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K

Real Objects Can Impede Conditional Reasoning but Augmented Objects Do Not.

Yuri Sato1, Yutaro Sugimoto2, Kazuhiro Ueda1

  • 1Department of General Systems Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo.

Cognitive Science
|October 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Real objects impede conditional reasoning by over-specifying a single state, while augmented real (AR) objects do not, according to the visual impedance hypothesis applied to diagrammatic reasoning.

Keywords:
Augmented realityConditionalsDiagrammatic reasoningExternal representationHuman reasoningSemantics

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.8K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.4K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.8K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • The visual impedance hypothesis suggests irrelevant visual details in mental representations can hinder reasoning.
  • External representations, such as diagrams and objects, play a crucial role in human reasoning processes.
  • Understanding how different types of external representations influence reasoning is vital for designing effective cognitive tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of real objects versus augmented real (AR) objects on conditional reasoning.
  • To test whether the visual impedance hypothesis extends to the manipulation of external representations.
  • To determine if the specificity of external objects influences the validity of logical inferences.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed conditional reasoning tasks (e.g., "if P then Q" to "P").
  • Participants manipulated either real-world objects or augmented real (AR) objects corresponding to the premises.
  • Inference validity and object manipulation actions were recorded and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Participants manipulating real objects made significantly more invalid inferences compared to those using AR objects or no objects.
  • No significant difference in inference validity was found between participants using AR objects and those not manipulating objects.
  • Real objects impeded conditional reasoning, whereas AR objects did not.

Conclusions:

  • External representations, particularly real objects, can impede reasoning by over-specifying a single state, aligning with the visual impedance hypothesis.
  • Augmented real (AR) objects, by suggesting multiple possibilities, do not impede conditional reasoning.
  • The findings highlight the importance of representation design in cognitive tasks and suggest AR environments may offer advantages for reasoning.