Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in India-Time to raise the bar

Lokeswara Rao Sajja1, Prashanthi Beri2

  • 1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, STAR Hospitals, Hyderabad, India; Sajja Heart Foundation, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad, India.

Indian Heart Journal
|October 22, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is underutilized in India, with only 10% of surgeons using it. Key concerns include deep sternal wound infection and longer operative times, hindering wider adoption of this revascularization strategy.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is increasingly recognized for superior long-term outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery disease.
  • Despite evidence supporting BITA, its adoption as a primary revascularization strategy remains limited among cardiac surgeons.
  • This study investigates the current utilization patterns and perceived barriers to BITA grafting in India.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current prevalence of BITA grafting use among Indian cardiac surgeons.
  • To identify the specific clinical scenarios where BITA grafting is avoided.
  • To determine the primary concerns and challenges associated with implementing BITA grafting in India.

Main Methods:

  • A nationwide survey was conducted among 856 Indian cardiac surgeons specializing in adult cardiac surgery.
  • A questionnaire was administered to gather data on the use of single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts.
  • Surgeons were queried about their BITA grafting strategies in various patient populations and clinical situations.

Main Results:

  • Only 10.7% of surveyed surgeons utilize BITA grafting, with 79% predominantly using single ITA grafts.
  • Significant avoidance of BITA grafting was reported in patients with smoking history (53%), obesity (58%), and acute coronary syndrome (62%).
  • The main concerns cited for limiting BITA use were deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) (40%), increased operative time (27%), and uncertainty regarding superiority (12%).

Conclusions:

  • BITA grafting is underutilized in India, with its application restricted to approximately 10% of cases.
  • Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) and increased operative time are the principal obstacles hindering the broader adoption of BITA grafting.
  • Addressing these concerns is crucial for increasing the utilization of BITA grafting for improved patient outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos