Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Transcutaneous Microcirculatory Imaging in Preterm Neonates
Published on: December 31, 2015
Skin care for healthy babies at term: A systematic review of the evidence
Alison Cooke1, Carol Bedwell2, Malcolm Campbell2
1Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building Room 4.336, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Insights
Gentle baby skin care is key. For bathing and cleansing, tested products and water showed no significant differences. Daily emollient therapy may help prevent eczema in high-risk infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal dermatology
- Evidence-based practice in pediatrics
Background:
- Infant skin is delicate and requires specific care practices.
- Understanding effective skin care for healthy term babies (0-6 months) is crucial for preventing issues and promoting skin health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify essential skin care practices for protecting baby skin in healthy term infants (0-6 months).
- To provide evidence-based conclusions for healthcare professionals and parents on infant skin care.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of empirical quantitative and qualitative research published between 2000-2015.
- Searched 11 databases for studies on bathing, cleansing, nappy care, dry skin, and massage for healthy term babies up to 6 months.
- Included 26 papers (16 RCTs, 3 non-randomised experimental, 1 mixed-methods, 6 qualitative); meta-analysis and narrative statistics were used.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between tested wash products/wipes and water.
- Daily full-body emollient therapy may reduce atopic eczema risk in high-risk infants.
- Olive oil or sunflower oil may negatively impact infant skin barrier function; no evidence on hair/scalp care or massage.
Conclusions:
- Meta-analysis was limited by inconsistent outcome measures across studies.
- Evidence suggests no difference between tested products and water for bathing, cleansing, and nappy care, allowing parental choice.
- Development of a core outcome measure set for infant skin care trials is recommended.
Objectives:
to identify what skin practices are important for the protection of baby skin in healthy term babies (0-6 months) and generate evidence-based conclusions to inform health professionals and parents.
Design:
eleven databases were searched for all empirical quantitative and qualitative research published between 2000-2015 which explored baby skin care for bathing and cleansing, nappy care, hair and scalp care, management of dry skin or baby massage, for healthy term babies up to 6 months old. Papers not published in English were excluded. A total of 3062 papers were identified. Pairs of reviewers assessed all citations and extracted data independently. There were 26 included papers: 16 RCTs, 3 non-randomised experimental studies, 1 mixed-methods study and 6 qualitative studies. Primary and secondary outcome measures were analysed using meta-analysis or narrative descriptive statistics. Synthesis of qualitative data was not possible due to disparity of the evidence.
Findings:
from the small numbers of studies with comparable data, there was no evidence of any significant differences between tested wash products and water or tested baby wipes and water. There was some evidence to suggest that daily use of full-body emollient therapy may help to reduce the risk of atopic eczema in high risk babies with a genetic predisposition to eczema; however, the use of olive oil or sunflower oil for baby dry skin may adversely affect skin barrier function. There was no evidence about hair/scalp care or baby massage. Qualitative research indicates that parents and health professionals believe that water alone is best.
Key Conclusions:
meta-analysis was restricted due to the lack of consistency of study outcome measures. Although there is considerable RCT evidence comparing the use of specific products against water alone, or another product, for bathing, cleansing and nappy care, the power of this evidence is reduced due to inconsistency of outcome measures in terms of outcome, treatment site or time-point. The development of a core outcome measure set is advocated for trials assessing skin care practices.
Implications For Practice:
this review offers health professionals best evidence available on which to base their advice. Of those studies with comparative outcomes, the evidence indicates no difference between the specific products tested and water alone; offering parents a choice in their baby skin care regimen. Protocol available: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/28054_PROTOCOL_20151009.pdf.
More Related Videos
09:36Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
07:11Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Introduction to the Integumentary System
The skin, which is the primary organ of the integumentary system, consists of three main layers: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis (subcutaneous tissue). The epidermis is the...
Teratogenicity
Accessory Structures of the Skin: Sebaceous Glands
These glands that produce the oils on the skin and hair are holocrine glands. The mature...
Parental Care