Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

417
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
417
Distance Measurements by Taping01:18

Distance Measurements by Taping

494
Tapes are essential in surveying for accurate, durable, and short-distance measurements. Made from lightweight, nylon-coated steel, they offer flexibility and strength for rugged outdoor use. The nylon coating protects against rust and wear, extending the tape's life. Standard lengths, around 30 meters, are marked in meters and millimeters for precision.Surveyors select tapes based on site conditions and accuracy needs. Lightweight, nylon-coated tapes are commonly used for ease of handling and...
494
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys01:30

Types of Global Positioning System Surveys

382
GPS surveying methods vary in application, accuracy, and data collection techniques, catering to diverse surveying and mapping needs. Static GPS, kinematic GPS, and real-time kinematic (RTK) surveying are widely used. Each technique offers distinct advantages.Static GPS involves placing one receiver at a known reference point and another at the target point. It collects exact positional data by observing multiple satellite ranges over an extended period, achieving centimeter-level accuracy for...
382
Field Application of Global Positioning System01:28

Field Application of Global Positioning System

335
The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become an indispensable tool in fieldwork, offering unparalleled precision and efficiency for surveying, navigation, and infrastructure development. By harnessing signals from a constellation of satellites, GPS receivers determine the location of objects with remarkable speed and accuracy, often completing calculations within a second.Advantages of Modern GPS TechnologyContemporary GPS receivers are designed to meet the practical demands of field...
335
Selected Data About Geographic Locations01:25

Selected Data About Geographic Locations

281
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) rely on two core types of data: spatial data and attribute data.Spatial DataSpatial data defines the physical location of features within a coordinate system, typically expressed in terms of latitude and longitude. It provides precise positioning for elements like roads, rivers, or buildings.Attribute DataAttribute data complements spatial data by adding descriptive information about these features. For example, a road's spatial data includes its start and...
281
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

368
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
368

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Mobile App (MyPeer) Co-Designed With Immigrant Adolescents for Better Sexual and Reproductive Health: Usability Study.

JMIR formative research·2025
Same author

Correction: Using Wearable Devices and Speech Data for Personalized Machine Learning in Early Detection of Mental Disorders: Protocol for a Participatory Research Study.

JMIR research protocols·2025
Same author

Machine Learning Analysis of Engagement Behaviors in Older Adults With Dementia Playing Mobile Games: Exploratory Study.

JMIR serious games·2025
Same author

A Health Professional Mentorship Platform to Improve Equitable Access to Abortion: Development, Usability, and Content Evaluation.

JMIR human factors·2025
Same author

Using Wearable Devices and Speech Data for Personalized Machine Learning in Early Detection of Mental Disorders: Protocol for a Participatory Research Study.

JMIR research protocols·2023
Same author

Examining Patient Engagement in Chatbot Development Approaches for Healthy Lifestyle and Mental Wellness Interventions: Scoping Review.

Journal of participatory medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.5K

Sensor-Data Fusion for Multi-Person Indoor Location Estimation.

Parisa Mohebbi1, Eleni Stroulia2, Ioanis Nikolaidis3

  • 1Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada. mohebbi@ualberta.ca.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 24, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study develops a sensor fusion method for indoor localization, combining anonymous motion sensors and wearable devices. It effectively tracks individuals, even when they cannot carry smartphones, improving location accuracy in daily living activities.

Keywords:
BLE beaconsBluetooth Low-Energy (BLE)Estimoteactivities of daily livingactivity recognitionanonymous sensingeponymous sensingindoor localizationpassive infrared (PIR) sensorssensor fusion

More Related Videos

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.2K
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.5K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.2K
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ubiquitous Computing
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Sensor Networks

Background:

  • Indoor localization is crucial for monitoring people's movement and activities.
  • Tracking individuals who cannot carry wearable devices, such as in caregiving scenarios, presents unique challenges.
  • Existing methods often rely on wearable sensors, limiting applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a sensor fusion solution for indoor localization.
  • To address scenarios where individuals cannot or will not carry smartphones.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of combining anonymous and eponymous sensors for location estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized anonymous Passive Infrared (PIR) motion sensors.
  • Employed eponymous wearable sensors (smartphones with Estimote beacons).
  • Developed a sensor-fusion approach to integrate data from disparate sources.

Main Results:

  • Investigated the performance of anonymous-only, eponymous-only, and combined sensor strategies.
  • Analyzed the impact of sensor data synchronization on location estimate quality.
  • Examined the trade-off between sensor coverage and localization accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Combining anonymous and eponymous sensors offers a robust solution for indoor localization.
  • Synchronization issues can be mitigated without device-level mechanisms.
  • Sensor coverage and fusion strategies are key to accurate location estimation in complex environments.