Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementing an Evidence-based Tobacco Control Program at Five 2-1-1 Call Centers: An Evaluation Using the
Tess Thompson1, Matthew W Kreuter1, Nicole Caito1
1Health Communication Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
The Smoke-Free Homes (SFH) Program is feasible for low-income populations via 2-1-1 centers. Addressing workflow, time, and funding challenges is key for scaling up this tobacco control intervention.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Tobacco Control
Background:
- Smoke-free home policies are crucial for reducing secondhand smoke exposure.
- Evidence-based interventions are needed to promote smoke-free homes, especially in low-income populations.
- Social service agencies, like 2-1-1 call centers, offer a scalable platform for health interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze facilitators and barriers to scaling up the Smoke-Free Homes (SFH) Program within 2-1-1 call centers.
- To evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based intervention promoting smoke-free homes among low-income populations.
- To identify factors influencing the successful adoption and sustainability of public health programs in community service settings.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
- Online surveys administered to 2-1-1 staff before training, after training, and post-implementation (N=120, 101, 79).
- Semi-structured telephone interviews with 25 staff to explore attitudes, contextual factors, and implementation outcomes.
Main Results:
- Post-implementation, a majority of staff found SFH consistent with their mission (79%) and believed it increased smoke-free homes (70%).
- Perceived appropriateness and staff positivity toward SFH were lower post-implementation compared to pre-implementation.
- Staff reported concerns regarding intervention sustainability, required time and resources, and workflow integration.
Conclusions:
- The SFH intervention was found to be acceptable and feasible across multiple 2-1-1 sites.
- Implementation success was influenced by intervention delivery demands, perceived effectiveness, and organizational mission alignment.
- Addressing barriers such as funding, dedicated staff time, and workflow fit is essential for future scale-up of tobacco control programs.
More Related Videos
09:25Methods to Evaluate Cytotoxicity and Immunosuppression of Combustible Tobacco Product Preparations
Published on: January 10, 2015
09:30A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...