Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver
Published on: June 27, 2025
On algorithms for calculating arterial pulse pressure variation during major surgery.
Shaoxiong Sun1, Wouter H Peeters, Rick Bezemer
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands. Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Pulse pressure variation (PPV) algorithms are crucial for fluid management but their reliability during surgery is unclear. This study shows proposed signal processing enhances PPV robustness during surgical procedures.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cardiovascular Physiology
Background:
- Arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV) is a key indicator for fluid responsiveness in critical care and operating rooms.
- Existing PPV algorithms are primarily validated under stable hemodynamic conditions, limiting their application during dynamic surgical environments.
- Rapid blood pressure fluctuations during surgery can compromise the accuracy of standard PPV calculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively assess the robustness of various PPV algorithms during surgical procedures.
- To investigate the impact of different algorithmic designs on PPV accuracy amidst hemodynamic instability.
- To propose and evaluate novel signal processing techniques to enhance PPV reliability in surgical settings.
Main Methods:
- Arterial blood pressure waveforms were collected from 23 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
- Three clinically relevant metrics were developed to evaluate PPV algorithm performance.
- The study compared the performance of existing algorithms with a proposed enhanced processing method.
Main Results:
- All tested PPV algorithms demonstrated adequate performance during periods of hemodynamic stability.
- The proposed signal processing method significantly improved the robustness of PPV calculations throughout the surgical course.
- The enhanced PPV approach proved more reliable in dynamic surgical conditions compared to standard methods.
Conclusions:
- Standard PPV algorithms show limitations in accuracy during the rapid hemodynamic changes common in surgery.
- The developed signal processing technique offers a more robust and reliable method for calculating PPV in surgical patients.
- This advancement supports improved fluid management strategies in the operating room and intensive care unit.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

