Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Laparoscopic-Assisted Seldinger Technique for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion
Published on: May 23, 2025
Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: The First Year of Brazilian Experience
Dayana Bitencourt Dias1, Marcela Lara Mendes, Vanessa Burgugi Banin
1São Paulo State University - UNESP, Alameda dasHortencias, Botucatu, Brazil.
Insights
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a safe and feasible option for patients needing immediate dialysis. This study found low complication rates and good patient survival within the first six months.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Renal Medicine
Background:
- Urgent-start dialysis is crucial for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.
- Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers an alternative to hemodialysis for immediate initiation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess mechanical and infectious complications of urgent-start PD.
- To evaluate patient and technique survival in the initial 180 days of PD.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of chronic patients starting unplanned PD within 72 hours of catheter placement.
- Utilized high-volume PD (HVPD) initially, followed by intermittent PD post-discharge.
- Included 51 patients with ESRD, primarily due to diabetes and uremia.
Main Results:
- Achieved metabolic and fluid control after 3 HVPD sessions.
- Mechanical complications occurred in 25.7%; peritonitis rate was 0.5 episodes/patient-year.
- Six-month patient and technique survival rates were 82.4% and 86%, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Urgent-start PD is a viable and safe alternative to urgent hemodialysis.
- Effective for rapid initiation of renal replacement therapy in critical situations.
Background:
This study aimed to evaluate mechanical and infectious complications associated with urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) and patients and technique survival in the first 180 days.
Methods:
It was a prospective study that evaluated chronic patients who started unplanned PD using high-volume PD (HVPD) right after (<72 h) PD catheter placement. After hospital discharge, patients were treated with intermittent PD on alternate days in a dialysis unit until family training was provided.
Results:
Fifty-one patients fulfilling the following criteria were included: age was 62.1 ± 15 years, with diabetes as the main etiology of end-stage renal disease (39%), and uremia as the main dialysis indication (76%). Metabolic and fluid controls were achieved after 3 sessions of HVPD, and patients remained in intermittent PD for 23.2 ± 7.2 days. Mechanical complications occurred in 25.7% and peritonitis rate was 0.5 episode/patient-year. In the first 6 months, technique and patients survival rates were 86 and 82.4% respectively.
Conclusion:
The PD modality was a feasible and safe alternative to hemodialysis in the urgent-start dialysis.
Related Concept Videos
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction

