What have we learned about heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction one year after its introduction?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Jan F Nauta1, Yoran M Hummel1, Joost P van Melle1
1Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) shares similarities with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and may benefit from HFrEF therapies. Research is ongoing into this distinct heart failure category.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- The 2016 ESC guidelines defined heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) for ejection fraction (EF) of 40-49%.
- HFmrEF constitutes approximately 20% of heart failure cases, representing an area needing further investigation.
- This category was established to encourage dedicated research into this patient group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review key research findings concerning HFmrEF.
- To compare HFmrEF characteristics with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
- To explore the prognostic implications of EF changes and treatment benefits in HFmrEF.
Main Methods:
- Review of published literature and retrospective analyses from clinical trials.
- Comparative analysis of HFmrEF against HFrEF and HFpEF based on aetiology, EF dynamics, and treatment response.
- Examination of prognostic data related to EF trajectory in HFmrEF patients.
Main Results:
- HFmrEF shares a higher frequency of ischaemic aetiology with HFrEF compared to HFpEF.
- Ejection fraction variability over time is significant, with progression to HFrEF associated with a poorer prognosis.
- Retrospective data suggest HFmrEF patients may benefit from therapies proven effective in HFrEF, unlike HFpEF patients.
Conclusions:
- HFmrEF represents a distinct clinical entity with characteristics aligning more closely with HFrEF.
- Prognosis in HFmrEF is influenced by the dynamic changes in ejection fraction over time.
- Evidence suggests potential therapeutic benefits from HFrEF-specific treatments for HFmrEF patients, warranting further investigation.
Abstract:
The 2016 European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines introduced the term 'heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction' (HFmrEF) to refer to patients with heart failure and a mildly reduced ejection fraction of 40-49%. About 20% of heart failure patients fall in this category. One of the main reasons for the introduction of this category was to stimulate research into this grey area. This review aims to highlight the key findings that have been published so far. Firstly, HFmrEF more closely resembles heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) than preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with regard to ischaemic aetiology, which is more frequent in both HFmrEF and HFrEF compared to HFpEF. Secondly, changes in ejection fraction over time are common, and seem to be more important than baseline ejection fraction alone. Patients who progress from HFmrEF to HFrEF have a worse prognosis than those who remain stable or transition to HFpEF. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, retrospective analyses from a randomized trial suggest that patients with HFmrEF seem to benefit from therapies that have shown to improve outcome in HFrEF, whereas no such benefit was seen in patients with HFpEF.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

