Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Predictors of Posthospital Transitions of Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Daniel E Lage1, Ryan D Nipp1, Sara M D'Arpino1
1Daniel E. Lage, Ryan D. Nipp, Sara M. D'Arpino, Samantha M. Moran, P. Connor Johnson, Risa L. Wong, Ephraim P. Hochberg, Barbara J. Cashavelly, Holly S. Martinson, David P. Ryan, Jennifer S. Temel, and Areej El-Jawahri, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Daniel E. Lage, Ryan D. Nipp, P. Connor Johnson, Risa L. Wong, Ephraim P. Hochberg, Lara N. Traeger, Vicki A. Jackson, Joseph A. Greer, David P. Ryan, Jennifer S. Temel, and Areej El-Jawahri, Harvard Medical School; Lara N. Traeger, Vicki A. Jackson, and Joseph A. Greer, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; and William F. Pirl, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Abstract:
Purpose Patients with advanced cancer experience potentially burdensome transitions of care after hospitalizations. We examined predictors of discharge location and assessed the relationship between discharge location and survival in this population. Methods We conducted a prospective study of 932 patients with advanced cancer who experienced an unplanned hospitalization between September 2014 and March 2016. Upon admission, we assessed patients' physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) and psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-4). The primary outcome was discharge location (home without hospice, postacute care [PAC], or hospice [any setting]). The secondary outcome was survival. Results Of 932 patients, 726 (77.9%) were discharged home without hospice, 118 (12.7%) were discharged to PAC, and 88 (9.4%) to hospice. Those discharged to PAC and hospice reported high rates of severe symptoms, including dyspnea, constipation, low appetite, fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Using logistic regression, patients discharged to PAC or hospice versus home without hospice were more likely to be older (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.05; P < .001), live alone (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.02; P < .003), have impaired mobility (OR, 5.08; 95% CI, 3.46 to 7.45; P < .001), longer hospital stays (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.20; P < .001), higher Edmonton Symptom Assessment System physical symptoms (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.032; P < .017), and higher Patient Health Questionnaire-4 depression symptoms (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.25; P < .027). Patients discharged to hospice rather than PAC were more likely to receive palliative care consultation (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 2.12 to 9.29; P < .001) and have shorter hospital stays (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.91; P < .001). Patients discharged to PAC versus home had lower survival (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.93; P < .001). Conclusion Patients with advanced cancer who were discharged to PAC facilities and hospice had substantial physical and psychological symptom burden, impaired physical function, and inferior survival compared with those discharged to home. These patients may benefit from interventions to enhance their quality of life and care.
More Related Videos
06:52Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Planning Nursing Care I
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management