Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles.

Brian P Kelley^1,2, Kevin C Chung^1,2

¹Ann Arbor, Mich.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

|October 26, 2017

Summary

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize medical literature, but design errors can mislead. This article provides a framework and examples to ensure accurate and effective use of these crucial research tools.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Are There Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcomes Following Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

The American journal of cardiology·2024

Same author

"Toward Breast Reinnervation- What is our Endpoint" A systematic review of normal breast sensibility.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2024

Same author

To flip or not: Case series of coronary angioplasty in patients with right-sided heart.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2024

Same author

Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Acute Mitral Regurgitation With Nonischemic Etiology Successfully Stabilized by Transcatheter Intervention.

CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2023

Same author

Hemodynamic Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of permanent His bundle and biventricular pacing after AV nodal ablation.

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature·2022

Same author

Developing a Mechanistic Approach to Sudden Death Prevention in Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Journal of clinical medicine·2022

Area of Science:

Medical Informatics
Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

The rapid growth of medical literature necessitates efficient information synthesis.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are key tools for condensing research.
Potential errors in study design can compromise the reliability of these summaries.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline the appropriate applications of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
To introduce a framework for developing high-quality summary studies.
To highlight common pitfalls in the design and execution of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Main Methods:

Literature review and synthesis of best practices.
Development of a conceptual framework for study design.
Illustrative examples of design flaws and their consequences.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Main Results:

Effective systematic reviews and meta-analyses pool data, inform guidelines, and direct future research.
Errors in methodology can lead to inaccurate or misleading conclusions.
A structured approach is essential for reliable evidence synthesis.

Conclusions:

Properly executed systematic reviews and meta-analyses are vital for navigating complex medical information.
Adherence to a robust framework mitigates risks of flawed research synthesis.
Understanding design pitfalls enhances the credibility and utility of summary research.