Mechanistic overview of immune checkpoints to support the rational design of their combinations in cancer immunotherapy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Analysis of Human T Cell Activity in an Allogeneic Co-Culture Setting of Pre-Treated Tumor Cells
Published on: March 7, 2025
Abstract:
Checkpoint receptor blockers, known to act by blocking the pathways that inhibit immune cell activation and stimulate immune responses against tumor cells, have been immensely successful in the treatment of cancer. Among several checkpoint receptors of immune cells, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), T-cell immunoglobulin-3 (TIM-3) and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) are the most commonly targeted checkpoints for cancer immunotherapy. Six drugs including one CTLA-4 blocker (ipilimumab), two PD-1 blockers (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and three PD-L1 blockers (atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab) are approved for the treatment of different types of cancers including both solid tumors such as melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer and Merkel cell cancer as well as hematological tumors such as classic Hodgkin's lymphoma. The main problem with checkpoint blockers is that only a fraction of patients respond to the therapy. Insufficient immune activation is considered as one of the main reason for low response rates and combination of checkpoint blockers has been proposed to increase the response rates. The combination of checkpoint blockers was successful in melanoma but had significant adverse events. A combination that is selected based on the mechanistic differences between checkpoints and the differences in expression of checkpoints and their ligands in the tumor microenvironment could have a synergistic effect in a given cancer subtype and also have a manageable safety profile. This review aims to help in design of optimal checkpoint blocker combinations by discussing the mechanistic details and outlining the subtle differences between major checkpoints targeted for cancer immunotherapy.
Insights
Checkpoint blockers improve cancer treatment, but low response rates persist. Combining blockers strategically, based on their mechanisms and tumor expression, may enhance efficacy and safety for better cancer immunotherapy outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Checkpoint receptor blockers are vital in cancer immunotherapy by disinhibiting immune cells against tumors.
- Approved blockers target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and PD-L1, treating various solid and hematological cancers.
- Low patient response rates to single-agent checkpoint blockers are a significant clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the mechanistic details of major immune checkpoint inhibitors.
- To outline the differences between targeted checkpoints for cancer immunotherapy.
- To guide the design of optimal checkpoint blocker combinations for improved efficacy and safety.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their mechanisms.
- Analysis of checkpoint and ligand expression in the tumor microenvironment.
- Discussion of combination strategies for cancer immunotherapy.
Main Results:
- Checkpoint blockers like ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab are approved for cancer treatment.
- Combination therapies have shown promise but can lead to significant adverse events.
- Strategic combination based on mechanistic differences and tumor microenvironment expression is key.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing checkpoint blocker combinations requires understanding individual checkpoint mechanisms and tumor-specific expression patterns.
- Tailored combinations hold the potential for synergistic anti-tumor effects and improved safety profiles in cancer immunotherapy.
- This review provides insights for designing more effective and safer combination immunotherapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cytotoxic T Cells-mediated Immune Response
Immunological surveillance is the ability of immune cells to monitor and eliminate infected cells with intracellular pathogens, neoplastically transformed cells, and cells with non-self antigens. Cytotoxic T cells and NK...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...

