Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance
Published on: June 6, 2025
Success Rates of Endoscopic-Assisted Probing Compared to Conventional Probing in Children 48 Months or Older
Alicia Galindo-Ferreiro1, Rajiv Khandekar2, Patricia Mitiko Akaishi3
1a Department of Ophthalmology , Rio Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid , Spain.
Insights
Endoscopic-assisted probing shows significantly higher success rates for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children over 48 months compared to conventional probing. This method is particularly effective in older children.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common condition in children.
- Older children (≥48 months) with CNLDO often present management challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing versus conventional probing for CNLDO in children aged 48 months and older.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 112 children (≥48 months) with CNLDO.
- Comparison between endoscopic-assisted probing (37 patients) and conventional probing (75 patients).
- Success defined by resolution of tearing/discharge and normal fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT).
Main Results:
- Endoscopic-assisted probing achieved a success rate of 94.6% (CI: 89.5-99.7%).
- Conventional probing had a success rate of 58.7% (CI: 47.6-69.8%).
- Higher success rates were observed with endoscopic probing, especially in older children.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic-assisted probing offers superior outcomes for treating CNLDO in children, including older age groups.
- The enhanced visualization and treatment capabilities of endoscopy likely contribute to its higher efficacy.
- This technique provides a more effective solution for challenging CNLDO cases.
Background:
To evaluate the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing compared to conventional probing in children 48 months or older.
Methods:
This retrospective study included children 48 months and older with CNLDO who underwent endoscopic-assisted probing or conventional probing between January 2011 to August 2015 at a tertiary eye care hospital in central Saudi Arabia. Probing was considered successful when signals of tearing or discharge disappeared and fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) was normal. Demographic data, clinical features, intraoperative and postoperative variables were correlated to the success rate.
Results:
One hundred and twelve children with CNLDO undergoing endoscopic-assisted (37 patients) or conventional (75 patients) probing were included. The success rates of endoscopic-assisted and conventional probing were 94.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.5-99.7] and 58.7% [95% (CI): 47.6-69.8], respectively. The success rate was higher with endoscopic probing, especially in older children.
Conclusions:
Endoscopic-assisted probing can achieve better outcomes to treat CNLDO, even in older children. The significantly higher success rates with endoscopic probing are likely due to the ability to observe and treat associated problems.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

