Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Reinforcement learning with associative or discriminative generalization across states and actions: fMRI at 3 T and 7 T.

Human brain mapping·2022
Same author

Distinct prediction errors in mesostriatal circuits of the human brain mediate learning about the values of both states and actions: evidence from high-resolution fMRI.

PLoS computational biology·2017
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Value-based decision making via sequential sampling with hierarchical competition and attentional modulation.

Jaron T Colas1

  • 1Computation and Neural Systems Program, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States of America.

Plos One
|October 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neurally plausible computational models better capture human value-based decision-making than traditional models. A novel model incorporating competition and attention accurately predicts choices and reaction times.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Formal dynamical models can explain perceptual and value-based decision-making.
  • Sequential-sampling models (e.g., race, drift-diffusion) are popular but may lack neural feasibility.
  • Connectionist models offer a bridge between mental phenomena and neurophysiology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test neurally plausible connectionist models against traditional models for value-based decision-making.
  • To develop and validate a novel computational model for human preferential choices.
  • To analyze the implications for neurophysiological data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical testing of various computational models with human food choice data.
  • Formulation of a novel six-parameter computational model with mutual inhibition and attentional modulation.
  • Meta-analysis of related experiments to validate model predictions.

Main Results:

  • Neurally plausible models quantitatively and qualitatively outperformed normative models in emulating behavior.
  • The novel six-parameter model demonstrated strong predictive power for value-based choices.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed the robustness of model-predicted trends in human decision-making and reaction times.

Conclusions:

  • Connectionist models offer superior explanations for value-based decision-making compared to simpler, normative models.
  • The developed computational model provides a more realistic framework for understanding neural computations in choice.
  • Findings support the integration of computational modeling with neurophysiological data analysis.