Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.8K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

109.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
109.5K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.8K
Significant Figures in Calculations00:58

Significant Figures in Calculations

20.3K
Uncertainty in measurements can be avoided by reporting the results of a calculation with the correct number of significant figures. This can be determined by the following rules for rounding numbers:
20.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Allocation and characterisation factors for absolute environmental sustainability assessment.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Text-to-flowsheet: an LLM-assisted pipeline for expert-level digitization and automated simulation of chemical processes.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

Time-explicit life cycle assessment: a flexible framework for coherent consideration of temporal dynamics.

The international journal of life cycle assessment·2026
Same author

Efficient Prediction of Multicomponent Adsorption Isotherms and Enthalpies of Adsorption in MOFs Using Classical Density Functional Theory.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

From Reaction Stoichiometry to Life Cycle Assessment: Decision Tree-Based Estimation Tool.

ACS environmental Au·2025
Same author

An ecosystem of carbon dioxide removal reviews - part 1: direct air CO<sub>2</sub> capture and storage.

Energy & environmental science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.8K

Second-Order Analytical Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment.

Sarah von Pfingsten1, David Oliver Broll1, Niklas von der Assen1

  • 1Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, RWTH Aachen University , Schinkelstr. 8, 52062 Aachen, Germany.

Environmental Science & Technology
|October 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Life cycle assessment (LCA) uncertainty analysis is improved with a second-order Taylor series expansion. This refined analytical method offers greater precision than first-order approaches, especially for complex systems and large uncertainties.

More Related Videos

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
09:18

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Published on: December 14, 2017

11.1K
Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
14:11

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published on: March 29, 2016

27.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.8K
Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
09:18

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Published on: December 14, 2017

11.1K
Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
14:11

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published on: March 29, 2016

27.7K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) results contain inherent uncertainties.
  • Current uncertainty analysis methods, like Monte Carlo simulations and first-order Taylor series, have limitations in precision and computational efficiency.
  • Accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial for reliable LCA outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine analytical uncertainty analysis in LCA by developing a second-order Taylor series expansion.
  • To compare the precision of first-order and second-order analytical approaches against Monte Carlo simulations.
  • To evaluate the performance of the refined method for systems with nonlinearities, such as recycling loops.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a second-order Taylor series expansion for analytical uncertainty analysis in LCA.
  • Applied the refined approach to hydrogen production via methane-cracking, incorporating a recycling loop.
  • Compared analytical variance results with statistical variances obtained from Monte Carlo simulations under varying loop strengths.

Main Results:

  • The second-order Taylor series approach provides significantly higher precision than the first-order method, particularly for substantial input uncertainties and systems with nonlinearities.
  • For systems without loops, the second-order approach yields results practically identical to exact values.
  • The refined method remains computationally inexpensive while enhancing accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The second-order Taylor series expansion is a more precise and computationally efficient method for analytical uncertainty analysis in LCA compared to first-order approaches.
  • This refined method is particularly beneficial for complex industrial systems with nonlinearities.
  • It is recommended for broader adoption in LCA practice to improve the reliability of environmental impact assessments.