Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robotic technological aids in esophageal surgery.

Fabrizio Rebecchi1, Marco E Allaix1, Mario Morino1

  • 1Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, Torino, Italy.

Journal of Visualized Surgery
|October 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: Diagnostic accuracy of 1,000 endorectal ultrasounds before transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplastic lesions.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Preoperative Very-Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet Versus Low-Calorie Diet in Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Rigid-platform transanal excision (TEM/TEO/TAMIS) for rectal neuroendocrine tumours: a single-centre TEM/TEO series and systematic review.

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of 1,000 endorectal ultrasounds before transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplastic lesions.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Association Between Colorectal Cancer Screening and Survival in Patients Older Than 70 Years: Results of A National Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Which prognostic factors for recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer?

Surgical endoscopy·2026

Robotic surgery offers enhanced visualization and precision for esophageal conditions. However, current evidence shows no significant benefits over conventional laparoscopy for most benign conditions, with more research needed for cancer treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Technology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Robotic technology offers improved visualization, dexterity, and ergonomics compared to standard laparoscopy.
  • Its application has expanded from benign esophageal conditions to operable esophageal cancer.
  • Current evidence is limited in demonstrating clear advantages for robotic approaches in many procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy and benefits of robotic technology in esophageal surgery.
  • To compare robotic approaches with conventional laparoscopic and open surgery for various esophageal conditions.
  • To identify areas where robotic surgery may offer advantages and where further research is needed.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of existing literature on robotic esophageal surgery.
Keywords:
Roboticesophagectomyfundoplicationmyotomy

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of comparative studies evaluating robotic versus conventional laparoscopic and open techniques.
  • Assessment of safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes for robotic procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant benefits of robotic technology over conventional laparoscopy for fundoplication, hiatal hernia repair, or Heller myotomy.
    • Potential advantages suggested in redo surgeries for failed procedures, requiring further investigation.
    • Robot-assisted esophagectomy appears safe and effective in selected patients, but superiority over other methods is not yet established.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic surgery has not demonstrated clear advantages over conventional laparoscopy for most benign esophageal conditions.
    • Further large-scale comparative studies are essential to define the role of robotic technology in redo surgeries and esophageal cancer treatment.
    • Ongoing randomized controlled trials are crucial for validating robotic-assisted esophagectomy for oncologic outcomes.