Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resectability and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a European case-vignette survey.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

ERS Statement on ultrasound guided interventions in respiratory disease.

The European respiratory journal·2026
Same author

Progress in Thymic Malignancy Care: The Imperative for Global Standards and Collaboration.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same author

A Delphi consensus report of the Italian society of thoracic surgery on influencing factors, use of a bleeding scale, and management of bleeding in thoracic surgery.

Frontiers in surgery·2026
Same author

Beyond adrenal fatigue: reframing the adrenal stress index through neutrophil-mediated glucocorticoid resistance.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026
Same author

Utility of blood biomarkers in inpatients with West Nile virus infection: an exploratory study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

757

Robotic lobectomies: when and why?

Sara Ricciardi1, Giuseppe Cardillo2, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa1

  • 1Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Journal of Visualized Surgery
|October 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Minimally invasive pulmonary resections (MIPR), including video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic surgery, offer improved outcomes over open procedures. This paper explores the appropriate use of robotic technology in lung resections.

Keywords:
Minimally invasivelobectomylung cancerrobotic

More Related Videos

Electromagnetic Navigation Transthoracic Nodule Localization for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery
07:30

Electromagnetic Navigation Transthoracic Nodule Localization for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

Published on: May 4, 2022

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Expanding Interventional Pulmonology Research with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy
04:10

Author Spotlight: Expanding Interventional Pulmonology Research with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

757
Electromagnetic Navigation Transthoracic Nodule Localization for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery
07:30

Electromagnetic Navigation Transthoracic Nodule Localization for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

Published on: May 4, 2022

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Expanding Interventional Pulmonology Research with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy
04:10

Author Spotlight: Expanding Interventional Pulmonology Research with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Minimally invasive pulmonary resections (MIPR) have gained prominence over traditional open thoracotomy.
  • Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic thoracic surgery demonstrate superior perioperative outcomes and comparable oncologic results.
  • Despite advancements, debate persists regarding the benefits of robotic surgery versus VATS for lung resections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the ongoing controversy surrounding robotic thoracic surgery.
  • To elucidate the specific advantages and indications for robotic technology in lung resections.
  • To provide guidance on the appropriate application of robotic surgery in thoracic procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature comparing robotic thoracic surgery with VATS and open thoracotomy.
  • Analysis of perioperative outcomes and oncologic results from studies on robotic lung resections.
  • Discussion of cost-effectiveness and operative time considerations for robotic platforms.

Main Results:

  • MIPR, encompassing both VATS and robotic approaches, consistently shows better perioperative results than thoracotomy.
  • Robotic thoracic surgery is considered a significant evolution beyond VATS, despite concerns about cost and operative duration.
  • Evidence supports the effectiveness of MIPR, including robotic surgery, for achieving equivalent oncologic control.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic thoracic surgery offers advancements over VATS, though its widespread adoption faces challenges.
  • The decision to use robotic technology for lung resections should be based on specific clinical scenarios and demonstrated benefits.
  • Further research and cumulative experience are needed to fully define the optimal role and indications for robotic surgery in thoracic procedures.