Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Utilizing Dual Mobility Components for First-Time Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability.
Jeffrey K Lange1, Sara K Spiro2, Geoffrey H Westrich2
1Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dual mobility components in revision total hip arthroplasty for instability showed a 5% re-dislocation rate. Unresolved instability etiology was linked to recurrent dislocations after revision surgery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a persistent clinical challenge.
- Limited research exists on dual mobility (DM) components for first-time revision THA due to instability.
- This study evaluates outcomes of DM components in revision THA for instability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate patient outcomes after first-time revision total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components for instability.
- To determine the re-dislocation and re-revision rates in this specific patient cohort.
- To identify factors associated with recurrent instability following revision THA.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of institution-wide revision THAs using DM components (2010-2013).
- Analysis of 40 patients undergoing first-time revision for instability, with an average 3-year follow-up.
- Classification of instability etiology, recording of patient data, re-dislocations, re-revisions, and radiographic measurements.
Main Results:
- A 5% rate of recurrent dislocation was observed in 2 patients.
- The all-cause re-revision rate was 10% (4 patients) at final follow-up.
- No significant association found between medical, demographic, or radiographic factors and recurrent instability risk.
Conclusions:
- Dual mobility components in first-time revision THA for instability demonstrated a 5% re-dislocation rate and 10% all-cause re-revision rate at 3-year follow-up.
- Instability of unresolved etiology was associated with re-dislocation after revision surgery.
- DM components appear to be a viable option for revision THA due to instability, though careful patient selection may be warranted.
More Related Videos
09:31Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022