Perinatal Periods of Risk Analysis: Disentangling Race and Socioeconomic Status to Inform a Black Infant Mortality

Catherine L Kothari1, Camryn Romph2, Terra Bautista3

  • 1Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, MI, 49008, USA. catherine.kothari@med.wmich.edu.

Insights

Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR) analysis revealed Black women face excess mortality beyond poverty, primarily due to preterm births of very-low-birthweight infants. Maternal and prenatal factors significantly increase Black infant prematurity and low birthweight risks.

Area of Science:

  • Perinatal health
  • Health equity research
  • Maternal and child health

Background:

  • Racial and socioeconomic disparities in perinatal outcomes persist.
  • Understanding the distinct contributions of race and poverty to adverse birth outcomes is critical for targeted interventions.
  • The Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR) framework offers a method to dissect complex risk factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate risks associated with being Black from those associated with poverty using PPOR analysis.
  • To identify specific risk factors contributing to excess perinatal mortality and morbidity in Black populations.
  • To inform evidence-based strategies addressing racial inequity and socioeconomic disadvantage in perinatal health.

Main Methods:

  • Phase I PPOR compared Black and poor women/infants against a White, non-Hispanic reference group, and then against each other.
  • Phase II PPOR partitioned excess risk into very-low-birthweight risk and birthweight-specific mortality risk.
  • A novel subtraction of poverty-excess-PPOR from Black-excess-PPOR isolated Black-specific risks, controlling for poverty.

Main Results:

  • Black excess mortality was predominantly linked to the Maternal-Health/Prematurity category (67% of total excess mortality).
  • This excess mortality in Black populations was driven by premature deliveries of very-low-birthweight infants.
  • Black women experience significant excess mortality independent of poverty; vaginal bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, prior preterm delivery, and lack of prenatal care were key predictors of preterm delivery.

Conclusions:

  • PPOR is a valuable tool for standardizing risk assessment and focusing health promotion efforts.
  • Maternal preconception and prenatal factors significantly elevate the risk of prematurity and low birthweight for Black infants, largely unaffected by socioeconomic status.
  • Findings support integrated community-wide strategies to combat systematic racial inequity and socioeconomic disadvantage in perinatal health.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
489
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
449
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K