Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds
Ludovic Chaput1,2,3,4,5, Liliane Mouawad6,7,8,9
1Chemistry, Modelling and Imaging for Biology (CMIB), Institut Curie - PSL Research University, Bât 112, Centre Universitaire, 91405, Orsay Cedex, France.
Evaluating four popular docking programs (Gold, Glide, Surflex, FlexX) for protein-ligand interactions revealed that while pose prediction was efficient, ranking correct poses was less so. Combining multiple programs using the United Subset Consensus (USC) method improved results, highlighting the need for improved scoring functions and ensemble approaches in drug design.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Drug discovery
- Structural biology
Background:
- Accurate protein-ligand interactions are crucial for structure-based drug design.
- Docking programs are essential for predicting ligand poses when experimental data is unavailable.
- Evaluating the performance of popular docking software is vital for successful drug optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of four leading docking programs: Gold, Glide, Surflex, and FlexX.
- To investigate the accuracy of ligand pose prediction and ranking in protein-ligand complexes.
- To explore methods for improving docking accuracy, including ensemble approaches.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 100 crystal structures of protein-ligand complexes from the Directory of Useful Decoys-Enhanced (DUD-E) database.
- Evaluated the semi-rigid docking capabilities of Gold, Glide, Surflex, and FlexX.
- Applied the United Subset Consensus (USC) method to combine results from multiple docking programs.
Main Results:
- Surflex achieved the highest success rate in predicting correct ligand poses (up to 84 complexes).
- Glide's scoring function (Glidescore) showed the best performance in ranking correct poses (up to 75 within top 4).
- The United Subset Consensus (USC) method improved results, yielding a correct pose in the top 4 for 87 complexes.
- No significant correlation was found between program performance and target/ligand properties, except for ligand rotatable bonds.
- Combining programs via USC was more effective than individual program rescoring or specific program combinations (e.g., Surflex-Glidescore).
Conclusions:
- Current scoring functions require improvement for accurate pose detection.
- Combining results from multiple docking programs, particularly using the USC method, enhances prediction accuracy.
- Ensemble docking strategies are recommended to increase the success rate in drug design and optimization.
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Conserved Binding Sites
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

