Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
A Response to Proposed Budget Cuts Affecting Children's Mental Health: Protecting Policies and Programs That Promote
Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood1, Marc Atkins1, Sarah Horwitz1
1Dr. Hoagwood, Dr. Horwitz, Dr. Olin, Ms. Kuppinger, Ms. Burton, and Ms. Shorter are with the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York. Dr. Atkins is with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois, Chicago. Dr. Kutash is with the Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa. Dr. Burns is with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Ms. Peth-Pierce is with Public Health Communications Consulting, LLC, Cleveland. Dr. Kelleher is with the Center for Innovation in Pediatric Practice, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract:
Children stand to lose if the federal government follows through on threats to cut funding for critical safety-net programs that have long supported families and communities. Although cuts directly targeting children's mental health are a great concern, cuts to policies that support health, housing, education, and family income are equally disturbing. These less publicized proposed cuts affect children indirectly, but they have direct effects on their families and communities. The importance of these services is supported by an extensive body of social learning research that promotes collective efficacy-neighbors positively influencing each other-shown to have positive long-term effects on children's development and adult outcomes. In this article, the authors describe two federal programs that by virtue of their impact on families and communities are likely to promote collective efficacy and positively affect children's mental health; both programs are facing severe cutbacks. They suggest that states adopt a cross-system approach to promote policies and programs in general medical health, mental health, housing, education, welfare and social services, and juvenile justice systems as a viable strategy to strengthen families and communities and promote collective efficacy. The overall goal is to advance a comprehensive national mental health policy for children that enhances collaboration across systems and strengthens families and communities, which is especially critical for children living in marginalized communities.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11:31Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Protecting Self-Esteem
Family Therapy
Strategic Family Therapy
Strategic family therapy emphasizes resolving communication barriers and improving problem-solving abilities...
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...