Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources
Published on: September 3, 2009
A parsimonious neutral model suggests Neanderthal replacement was determined by migration and random species drift
Oren Kolodny1, Marcus W Feldman2
1Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. okolodny@stanford.edu.
Abstract:
Most hypotheses in the heated debate about the Neanderthals' replacement by modern humans highlight the role of environmental pressures or attribute the Neanderthals' demise to competition with modern humans, who occupied the same ecological niche. The latter assume that modern humans benefited from some selective advantage over Neanderthals, which led to the their extinction. Here we show that a scenario of migration and selectively neutral species drift predicts the Neanderthals' replacement. Our model offers a parsimonious alternative to those that invoke external factors or selective advantage, and represents a null hypothesis for assessing such alternatives. For a wide range of parameters, this hypothesis cannot be rejected. Moreover, we suggest that although selection and environmental factors may or may not have played a role in the inter-species dynamics of Neanderthals and modern humans, the eventual replacement of the Neanderthals was determined by the repeated migration of modern humans from Africa into Eurasia.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Drift
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Gene Flow
Speciation Rates
Limits to Natural Selection
Hardy-Weinberg Principle

