Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Psychophysiological Interactions in a Visual Checkerboard Task: Reproducibility, Reliability, and the Effects of
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.
Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis in fMRI is reliable, but deconvolution may not be necessary. PPI effects showed lower reliability than activation, cautioning against group comparisons.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Background:
- Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) is a widely used fMRI method to assess task-modulated functional connectivity.
- The reliability and reproducibility of PPI findings, crucial for robust scientific conclusions, have remained largely unevaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reproducibility and reliability of PPI effects in a simple visual task.
- To examine the impact of deconvolution preprocessing on PPI results.
- To assess the consistency of PPI findings across different repetition times (TRs) and analysis methods.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a large open-access fMRI dataset (n=138) with a visual task scanned twice using TRs of 645 ms and 1,400 ms.
- Seed-based and region of interest (ROI)-wise analyses were conducted on 20 visual-related thalamic and cortical regions.
- Comparison of PPI results with and without deconvolution, and across different TRs.
Main Results:
- PPI analysis demonstrated good reproducibility between runs and similarity between deconvolution and non-deconvolution methods.
- Negative PPI effects were observed, with the posterior fusiform gyrus acting as a hub.
- Non-deconvolution and shorter TR (645 ms) generally yielded larger effect sizes, though deconvolution performed less optimally with the shorter TR.
- Intraclass correlations (ICC) for PPI effects were notably lower than for main activation effects between runs.
Conclusions:
- Deconvolution may not be essential for PPI analysis in block-designed fMRI studies, given the comparable results and uncertainties associated with its application.
- The lower reliability of PPI effects compared to activation main effects necessitates caution when performing inter-subject correlations and group comparisons.
- Findings highlight the importance of rigorous validation for connectivity measures in neuroimaging research.
More Related Videos
08:19Simultaneous Data Collection of fMRI and fNIRS Measurements Using a Whole-Head Optode Array and Short-Distance Channels
Published on: October 20, 2023
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025