Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026
Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
Neurochemical and Neuroendocrine Effects of Ibogaine in Rats: Comparison to MK-801
Michael H Baumann1, Richard B Rothman1, Syed F Ali1
1Clinical Psychopharmacology Section, Division of Intramural Research (DIR), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USANeurochemistry Laboratory, Division of Neurotoxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, Arkansas 72079-9502, USA.
Abstract:
Ibogaine (IBO) is a naturally-occurring indole compound that is being evaluated as a potential medication for substance use disorders. Although the precise mechanism of IBO action is unclear, recent in vitro data show this drug displays properties similar to the noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist MK-801. The purpose of the present work was to compare In Vivo neurobiological effects of IBO and MK-801 in rats. Groups of male rats (n = 6-8/group) were decapitated 30 and 60 min after receiving intraperitoneal (i.p.) IBO (10 & 100 mg/kg), MK-801 (0.1 & 1.0 mg/kg) or vehicle. Trunk blood was collected for the analysis of plasma prolactin and corticosterone; brains were harvested and dissected for determination of dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and their metabolites. Both IBO and MK-801 increased corticosterone secretion, but only IBO elevated plasma prolactin. IBO produced dramatic reductions in tissue DA levels with concurrent increases in the metabolites, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA). This profile of IBO-induced changes in DA transmission was observed in the striatum, olfactory tubercle, and hypothalamus. The effects of MK-801 on DA metabolism did not mimic IBO, as MK-801 tended to increase DA and its metabolites. Neither drug appreciably affected 5-HT systems. Our results suggest that the effects of IBO on neuroendocrine function and DA transmission are not due to MK-801-like properties of IBO. Thus, the In Vivo mechanism of IBO action cannot be explained simply on the basis of antagonism at NMDA receptors.
