Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds
Published on: November 26, 2012
Frequency shifting reduces but does not eliminate acoustic interference between echolocating bats: A theoretical
Melinda L Perkins1, Hannah K Frank2, John M Pauly1
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Bats adjust echolocation frequencies to avoid jamming. Models show frequency shifts help bats like Myotis yumanensis and Myotis californicus regain target acquisition, with specific shifts optimal for avoiding interference from similar or different species.
Area of Science:
- Bioacoustics
- Animal Communication
- Echolocation
Background:
- Bats use echolocation for navigation and foraging.
- Acoustic interference from other bats can disrupt echolocation.
- Jamming avoidance responses (JARs), like frequency shifts, are hypothesized to mitigate interference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To theoretically evaluate the efficacy of frequency shifting in bats' jamming avoidance responses.
- To analyze the impact of acoustic interference from conspecifics and congeneric heterospecifics on target acquisition.
- To compare the jamming avoidance strategies of Myotis californicus and Myotis yumanensis.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the wideband ambiguity function to model acoustic interference.
- Simulated unilateral and bilateral frequency shifts in echolocation calls.
- Assessed the effect of these shifts on target acquisition ability in simulated bat interactions.
Main Results:
- In conspecific interactions, Myotis yumanensis demonstrated more complete recovery of target acquisition with smaller frequency shifts than Myotis californicus.
- Optimal strategy for reducing heterospecific interference involved Myotis californicus downshifting its call and Myotis yumanensis upshifting.
- These shifts exaggerate existing frequency differences between the two species, potentially facilitating niche partitioning.
Conclusions:
- Frequency shifting can theoretically improve target acquisition under acoustic interference for both species.
- Species-specific optimal strategies exist for both conspecific and heterospecific interference.
- Further empirical research is needed to confirm active frequency shifting and its role in niche partitioning.
More Related Videos
14:44Harmonic Radar Tags for Insect Tracking: Lightweight, Low-cost, and Accessible
Published on: May 13, 2025
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Convergent Evolution
Sound Waves: Interference
Doppler Effect - II
Properties of Fourier Transform II
The Frequency Shifting property of Fourier Transforms highlights that a shift in the frequency domain corresponds to a phase shift in the time domain. Mathematically, if x(t) has...