Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Juliana Gerard1, Jeffrey Lidz2, Shalom Zuckerman3
1School of Communication and Media, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like "John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk." While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children's errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Hierarchy of Motor Control

