Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
Published on: July 17, 2021
Using a Visual Structured Criterion for the Analysis of Alternating-Treatment Designs
Marc J Lanovaz1,2, Patrick Cardinal3, Mary Francis1
11 Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
A new visual structured criterion (VSC) aids alternating-treatment designs analysis. This method offers reliable results, controlling errors and detecting behavior changes when used with sufficient data points.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Science
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Visual inspection is common for single-case designs but suffers from inter-rater reliability issues.
- Lack of rater agreement can compromise the validity of single-case design analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and examine the properties of a simple structured criterion.
- To supplement the visual analysis of alternating-treatment designs.
Main Methods:
- Generated simulated data sets with varied parameters (data points, conditions, effect sizes, autocorrelations).
- Measured Type I error rates and power using the visual structured criterion (VSC) and permutation analyses.
- Validated Type I error rates with non-simulated data.
Main Results:
- The VSC generally provides adequate control over Type I error rates.
- The VSC demonstrates sufficient power to detect most behavior changes.
- Adequate performance is observed with at least five data points per condition.
Conclusions:
- The visual structured criterion (VSC) is a valuable supplement for analyzing alternating-treatment designs.
- Using the VSC enhances the validity and reliability of single-case design analysis.
- The VSC offers a practical solution to the limitations of purely visual inspection.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Group Design
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Factorial Design
Experimental Designs

