Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Better early outcome with enteral rather than parenteral nutrition in children undergoing MAC allo-SCT
F Gonzales1, B Bruno1, M Alarcón Fuentes1
1Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Hématologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, F-59000 Lille, France.
Insights
Early enteral nutrition (EN) improves outcomes for children undergoing myeloablative conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). EN reduced mortality, GVHD, and hospital stay compared to parenteral nutrition (PN), suggesting it should be the primary nutritional support.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Clinical Nutrition
Background:
- Nutritional support is critical for pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after myeloablative conditioning (MAC).
- There is no established consensus on the optimal type of nutritional support (enteral vs. parenteral) in this vulnerable population.
- Early nutritional interventions significantly impact patient recovery and overall outcomes post-transplant.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus parenteral nutrition (PN) in children undergoing MAC allo-SCT.
- To evaluate the impact of nutritional support on key clinical outcomes, including mortality, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and engraftment.
- To determine the optimal timing and type of nutritional intervention for pediatric allo-SCT recipients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, multicenter, observational study comparing EN (n=97) and PN (n=97) groups.
- Patients were matched for important covariates to ensure comparability between groups.
- Primary endpoint was overall mortality at day 100 post-transplant; secondary endpoints included GVHD, engraftment, and length of stay.
Main Results:
- The EN group showed significantly lower day 100 overall mortality (1% vs. 13%, p=0.0127) and non-relapse mortality (1% vs. 7%, p=0.066).
- Acute GVHD grades II-IV (37% vs. 54%, p=0.0127) and gut localization (16% vs. 32%, p=0.0136) were reduced in the EN group.
- Platelet engraftment was superior in the EN group (97% vs. 80% for ≥20 G/L, p<0.0001), with a shorter hospital stay (28 vs. 52 days, p<0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Early administration of enteral nutrition is associated with improved outcomes in children undergoing MAC allo-SCT.
- Parenteral nutrition should be reserved for cases where enteral nutrition is insufficient or not feasible.
- These findings support EN as the preferred initial nutritional strategy in this patient population.
Abstract:
There is no consensus on the type of nutritional support to introduce in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after myeloablative conditioning (MAC). This retrospective, multicenter, observational study compared the early administration of enteral nutrition (EN group, n = 97) versus parenteral nutrition (PN group, n = 97) in such patients with matching for important covariates. The primary endpoint was the study of day 100 overall mortality. The early outcome at day 100 was better in EN group regarding mortality rate (1% vs. 13%; p = 0.0127), non relapse mortality (1% vs. 7%; p = 0.066), acute GVHD grades II-IV (37% vs. 54%; p = 0.0127), III-IV (18% vs. 34%; p = 0.0333) and its gut localization (16% vs. 32%; p = 0.0136). Platelet engraftment was better in EN group than in PN group for the threshold of 20 G/L (97% vs. 80% p < 0.0001) and 50 G/L (92% vs. 78%, p < 0.0001). The length of stay was shorter in EN group (28 vs. 52 days, p < 0.0001). There were no differences between the two groups regarding the polynuclear neutrophil engraftment, infection rate or mucositis occurrence. These results suggest that, in children undergoing MAC allo-SCT, PN should be reserved to the only cases when up-front EN is insufficient or impossible to perform.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism