Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

788
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
788
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Measures of performance and proficiency in robotic assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Journal of robotic surgery·2025
Same author

Correction to: Measures of performance and proficiency in robotic assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Journal of robotic surgery·2024
Same author

Measures of performance and proficiency in robotic assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Journal of robotic surgery·2024
Same author

Movement kinematic and postural control differences when performing a visuomotor skill in real and virtual environments.

Experimental brain research·2023
Same author

Is it time for a paradigm shift in early rectal cancer treatment?

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2023
Same author

STAR-TREC: An International Three-arm Multicentre, Partially Randomised Controlled Trial Incorporating an External Pilot.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.1K

Recommendations for Randomised Trials in Surgical Oncology.

J C Glasbey1, E L Magill2, K Brock3

  • 1Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
|November 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Designing surgical oncology trials presents unique challenges. This review offers evidence-based recommendations to improve the methodology, conduct, and reporting of randomized controlled trials in cancer surgery for better patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Colorectal canceroncologypatient and public representationrandomised trialsresearch methodologysurgery

More Related Videos

A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing Neoadjuvant Therapies
07:15

A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing Neoadjuvant Therapies

Published on: July 28, 2020

10.4K
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.1K
A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing Neoadjuvant Therapies
07:15

A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing Neoadjuvant Therapies

Published on: July 28, 2020

10.4K
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Trials
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Surgical oncology trials face distinct methodological hurdles.
  • Effective trial design is crucial for advancing cancer treatment.
  • Previous research has not fully addressed these specific challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline recommendations for designing, conducting, and reporting randomized trials in surgical oncology.
  • To identify and address key challenges in surgical cancer trials.
  • To improve the quality and efficiency of surgical oncology research.

Main Methods:

  • A narrative review of literature on trial methodology in surgery and surgical oncology.
  • Analysis framed around two National Institute of Health Research portfolio trials (STAR-TREC and ROCCS).
  • Identification of twelve specific challenges encountered in surgical trials.

Main Results:

  • Twelve key challenges were identified: technique standardization, pilot studies, treatment balancing, recruitment, outcome measures, patient involvement, trainee networks, randomization, novel techniques, learning curves, blinding, and follow-up.
  • Evidence-based recommendations were formulated for each challenge.
  • The review highlights the need for improved understanding and strategies for surgical oncology trials.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing the identified challenges is essential for high-quality evaluation of surgical cancer treatments.
  • Implementing the recommendations will facilitate the rapid adoption of innovations in patient care.
  • Enhanced trial design and conduct will ultimately benefit patients undergoing cancer surgery.