Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

An In Ovo Model for Testing Insulin-mimetic Compounds
Published on: April 23, 2018
How organizational research can avoid the pitfalls of a co-optation perspective: analyzing gender equality work in
1Vienna University of Economics and Business, Wien, Austria.
Abstract:
The concept of co-optation offers vocabulary to discuss how concerns and demands of feminist movements are transformed on their way to, and within, mainstream organizations and policymaking. However, applications of this concept can have problematic implications, failing to grasp the complexity of social change efforts and contributing to divisions, rather than alliances, between different groups that work and fight for gender equality. This article argues that conceptual tools from organizational institutionalism can help to avoid these pitfalls by capturing the ambivalence of organizational change initiatives, and allowing us to identify not only counterintentional effects, but also subtle and unexpected opportunities of organizational gender equality work. I illustrate my arguments with empirical examples from research on gender equality work in Austrian universities.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Horney's Sociocultural Approach
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Impact of Groups on Groups

