Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Injection of fat for soft tissue augmentation.

S J Wetmore1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

The Laryngoscope
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

This study compared two ways to add fat under the skin in rabbits. One group had fat injected, and the other had fat surgically placed. After several weeks, both groups had similar results in how much fat stayed and how it looked. About 40% of the injection and implantation sites could still be felt. Under a microscope, fat was present at most sites, but some fat cells were destroyed. The authors say that injecting fat could be a useful method for body contouring, even though it's not perfect. They don't claim it's the best option, but it might work well in some cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multimorbidity and mortality in Ontario, Canada: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Journal of comorbidity·2020
Same author

Clostridium difficile colitis following antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2001
Same author

Interactive effects of the middle ear pathology and the associated hearing loss on transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measures.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·1999
Same author

Cryosurgery for common skin lesions. Treatment in family physicians' offices.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·1999
Same author

Immunologic and histologic observations in reovirus-induced otitis media in the mouse.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·1999
Same author

Procedures in ambulatory care. Which family physicians do what in southwestern Ontario?

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·1998
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Plastic surgery techniques in reconstructive medicine
  • Soft tissue augmentation methods in cosmetic surgery
  • Tissue engineering within regenerative medicine

Background:

Prior research has shown that soft tissue augmentation often relies on surgical implantation of fat. However, the feasibility of injecting fat remains uncertain. It was already known that implanted fat can integrate into host tissue. No prior work had resolved whether injected fat could match surgical implantation in outcomes. This gap motivated a direct comparison of injection versus implantation methods. That uncertainty drove the need to assess tissue persistence and palpability over time. Researchers lacked clarity on whether injected fat would maintain volume or degrade rapidly. This study aimed to clarify these unresolved questions in a controlled animal model.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of subcutaneous fat injection versus surgical fat implantation. The specific problem addressed was whether fat injection could achieve similar augmentation results as surgical implantation. The motivation stemmed from clinical interest in less invasive augmentation techniques. Researchers wanted to determine if injected fat could maintain palpable volume over time. No prior work had directly compared these two approaches in a controlled setting. The study focused on assessing both gross and histological outcomes. The goal was to evaluate the clinical utility of fat injection as an alternative to implantation. This work aimed to provide evidence for the viability of injection in body contour improvement.

Keywords:
fat injectionsoft tissue augmentationanimal studybody contouring

Frequently Asked Questions

Both methods produced similar palpability and histological results after 16 to 36 weeks.

The fat was divided using scissors and razor blades before injection.

To assess long-term tissue persistence and fat cell destruction in both groups.

It suggests that both injection and implantation methods retained fat tissue over time.

Forty percent of injection sites were still palpable after 16 to 36 weeks.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used perinephric rabbit fat as the tissue source. Fat was divided into small particles using scissors and razor blades. Subcutaneous injection was performed in the donor rabbit. A separate group received surgically implanted fat. Both groups were observed for 16 to 36 weeks. Gross and histological assessments were conducted post-observation. Palpability and fat cell destruction were measured at each site. The comparison focused on volume retention and tissue integration.

Main Results:

Forty percent of injection sites remained palpable after the observation period. Similarly, 40% of implantation sites were palpable. Histologically, fat was present at nearly all sites. Destruction of fat cells varied across injection and implantation sites. No significant difference was found between the two methods. Both approaches showed comparable tissue persistence. The injected fat did not fully meet ideal augmentation criteria. However, it showed potential for body contour improvement.

Conclusions:

The authors state that fat injection produces comparable augmentation results to surgical implantation. They propose that injected fat may be clinically useful for body contouring. No claim is made about injected fat being the ideal augmentation material. The findings suggest fat injection could serve as a viable alternative. The authors do not assert that injected fat is superior to other augmentation substances. They emphasize the need for further clinical validation. The study does not generalize beyond the rabbit model. The results are limited to the specific injection and observation methods used.

The authors suggest fat injection may be useful for improving body contour clinically.