Related Experiment Videos
Delivery following cesarean section and perinatal mortality
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College, Galway, Ireland.
American Journal of Perinatology
|January 1, 1989
Summary
Trial of scar delivery for women with previous cesarean sections had a higher perinatal mortality rate (PMR). However, PMR improved over time, advocating for trial of scar in selected cases with informed consent.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Perinatal Health
Background:
- Analysis of perinatal mortality in women with prior cesarean scars.
- Examining outcomes of repeat elective cesarean sections versus trial of scar (TOS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze perinatal mortality rates (PMR) in patients with previous cesarean scars.
- To compare PMR between elective repeat cesarean sections and TOS.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TOS over time.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1498 deliveries between 1972-1982 in patients with one or more previous cesarean scars.
- Categorization of deliveries into elective repeat cesarean section and TOS groups.
- Calculation and comparison of perinatal mortality rates.
Main Results:
- Overall perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was 30.3/1000, higher than the hospital population (22.5/1000).
- Elective cesarean section had the lowest PMR (10.6/1000).
- TOS group had a corrected PMR twice as high as elective cesarean, but PMR in TOS decreased significantly over the study period.
- Four perinatal deaths were associated with uterine scar dehiscence.
Conclusions:
- Trial of scar (TOS) was associated with increased perinatal mortality compared to elective repeat cesarean section, particularly before the 1980s.
- Improvements in TOS outcomes were observed over time, suggesting enhanced patient selection or management.
- Advocacy for a policy of TOS in selected cases with informed consent, considering the risks of repeat cesarean delivery to the mother.