Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

2.7K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
2.7K
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation01:10

Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation

773
Signal processing techniques are essential for accurately converting continuous signals to digital formats and vice versa. When a continuous signal is sampled with a period T, the resulting sampled signal exhibits replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain, spaced at intervals equal to the sampling frequency. To handle this sampled signal, a zero-order hold method can be applied, which creates a piecewise constant signal by retaining each sample's value until the next...
773
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.6K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.6K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.7K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.5K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CIT-Lasso: a scalable approach beyond guilty by association for identifying causal variants from genome-wide summary statistics.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Uncovering Heterogeneous Effects via Localized Feature Selection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Second-order group knockoffs with applications to genome-wide association studies.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Convergence for nonconvex ADMM, with applications to CT imaging.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2024
Same author

Second-order group knockoffs with applications to GWAS.

ArXiv·2024
Same author

Controlled Variable Selection from Summary Statistics Only? A Solution via GhostKnockoffs and Penalized Regression.

ArXiv·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

EigenPrism: inference for high dimensional signal-to-noise ratios.

Lucas Janson, Rina Foygel Barber, Emmanuel Candès

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology
    |November 7, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary

    A new method, EigenPrism, provides accurate confidence intervals for high-dimensional regression problems, unifying inference for error, noise level, and genetic heritability. It

    Keywords:
    EigenPrismHeritabilityRegression errorSignal-to-noise ratioVariance estimation

    More Related Videos

    Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
    09:25

    Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

    Published on: January 6, 2023

    2.3K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    3.0K
    Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
    09:25

    Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

    Published on: January 6, 2023

    2.3K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Statistical Inference
    • High-Dimensional Statistics
    • Genomics

    Background:

    • Constructing confidence intervals for high-dimensional regression is challenging.
    • Existing methods often require assumptions on sparsity or noise level knowledge.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a unified statistical inference procedure for high-dimensional regression.
    • To address confidence interval construction for regression error, noise level, and genetic signal-to-noise ratio.

    Main Methods:

    • Introduced a novel procedure, EigenPrism, for inference on the signal norm in high-dimensional linear regression.
    • Developed asymptotically correct intervals for Gaussian covariates, valid in finite samples.
    • Demonstrated unification of three key statistical inference problems.

    Main Results:

    • EigenPrism provides valid confidence intervals with minor modifications for three distinct problems.
    • The method is computationally fast and makes no assumptions on coefficient sparsity or noise level.
    • Confidence intervals show robustness in coverage beyond Gaussian covariates.

    Conclusions:

    • EigenPrism offers a unified and efficient approach to statistical inference in high-dimensional settings.
    • The method has practical applications, including genetic data analysis for heritability estimation.
    • EigenPrism's performance is comparable to Bayesian methods, with intervals only 5% wider.