Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Should the Gross Motor Function Classification System be used for children who do not have cerebral palsy?
Megan Towns1,2, Peter Rosenbaum3,4, Robert Palisano3,5
1Bloorview Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Insights
The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) is used in many populations beyond cerebral palsy, but often without adequate justification. Recommendations are made for developing condition-specific or generic classification systems.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Pediatric Neurology
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) is a widely used tool for classifying motor function in children with cerebral palsy.
- Its application in populations other than cerebral palsy (CP) has not been systematically reviewed.
- Understanding its use and limitations outside CP is crucial for appropriate application and development of new tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the application of the GMFCS in populations other than CP.
- To assess the justifications and psychometric adequacy for its use in these populations.
- To provide recommendations for the development of condition-specific or generic gross motor function classification systems.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases from January 1997 to April 2017.
- Search terms included 'GMFCS' and 'Gross Motor Function Classification System'.
- 118 articles meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed for GMFCS application, study type, modifications, and justification.
Main Results:
- The GMFCS was applied to 133 health conditions/clinical descriptions outside of CP.
- Common applications included categorization, use as an independent variable, and as an outcome measure.
- Researchers rarely provided adequate justification or evidence of psychometric adequacy for using GMFCS in these diverse populations.
Conclusions:
- The GMFCS is frequently used in populations beyond CP, often inappropriately.
- There is a need for condition-specific classification systems or a generic system for gross motor function.
- Recommendations are provided for the development and validation of robust classification systems.
Abstract:
This literature review addressed four questions. (1) In which populations other than cerebral palsy (CP) has the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) been applied? (2) In what types of study, and why was it used? (3) How was it modified to facilitate these applications? (4) What justifications and evidence of psychometric adequacy were used to support its application? A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases (January 1997 to April 2017) using the terms: 'GMFCS' OR 'Gross Motor Function Classification System' yielded 2499 articles. 118 met inclusion criteria and reported children/adults with 133 health conditions/clinical descriptions other than CP. Three broad GMFCS applications were observed: as a categorization tool, independent variable, or outcome measure. While the GMFCS is widely used for children with health conditions/clinical description other than CP, researchers rarely provided adequate justification for these uses. We offer recommendations for development/validation of other condition-specific classification systems and discuss the potential need for a generic gross motor function classification system.
What This Paper Adds:
The Gross Motor Function Classification System should not be used outside cerebral palsy or as an outcome measure. The authors provide recommendations for development and validation of condition-specific or generic classification systems.
More Related Videos
09:24Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...