Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
Two-argument total scatter factor for small fields simultaneously collimated by MLC and jaws: application to
Zhaohui Han1,2,3, Scott Friesen1,2, Fred Hacker1,2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America.
None:
Direct use of the total scatter factor (S tot) for independent monitor unit (MU) calculations can be a good alternative approach to the traditional separate treatment of head/collimator scatter (S c) and phantom scatter (S p), especially for stereotactic small fields under the simultaneous collimation of secondary jaws and tertiary multileaf collimators (MLC). We have carried out the measurement of S tot in water for field sizes down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 on a Varian TrueBeam STx medical linear accelerator (linac) equipped with high definition MLCs. Both the jaw field size (c) and MLC field size (s) significantly impact the linac output factors, especially when c [Formula: see text] s and s is small (e.g. s < 5 cm). The combined influence of MLC and jaws gives rise to a two-argument dependence of the total scatter factor, S tot(c,s), which is difficult to functionally decouple. The (c,s) dependence can be conceived as a set of s-dependent functions ('branches') defined on domain [s min, s max = c] for a given jaw size of c. We have also developed a heuristic model of S tot to assist the clinical implementation of the measured S tot data for small field dosimetry. The model has two components: (i) empirical fit formula for the s-dependent branches and (ii) interpolation scheme between the branches. The interpolation scheme preserves the characteristic shape of the measured branches and effectively transforms the measured trapezoidal domain in (c,s) plane to a rectangular domain to facilitate easier two-dimensional interpolation to determine S tot for arbitrary (c,s) combinations. Both the empirical fit and interpolation showed good agreement with experimental validation data.

