Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
[Left atrial appendage closure and embolic events]
1Service Angio, institut cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud (ICPS), hôpital Jacques Cartier, Ramsay-Generale de santé, Massy, France.
Insights
Left atrial appendage closure shows non-inferiority to anticoagulation for preventing embolic events in atrial fibrillation. Further research is needed comparing it to direct oral anticoagulants and assessing cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently causes embolic events.
- Anticoagulant therapy (VKA, DOAC) is standard for AF stroke prevention.
- Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an emerging alternative for high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate LAAC as an alternative to anticoagulation in nonvalvular AF.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of LAAC versus VKA.
- To explore potential expanded indications for LAAC.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of randomized trial data comparing LAAC to VKA.
- Assessment of procedural improvements and complication rates for LAAC.
- Review of current literature on LAAC versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Main Results:
- LAAC demonstrated non-inferiority to VKA regarding stroke and cardiovascular death.
- LAAC procedures show improved safety and reduced complications.
- Anticoagulation poses risks of hemorrhage and adherence challenges in asymptomatic patients.
Conclusions:
- LAAC is a viable alternative to VKA for stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF.
- LAAC may be considered for lower-risk patients due to anticoagulation risks.
- More data is needed on LAAC versus DOACs and its cost-effectiveness.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent and responsible for embolic events. Currently, the gold standard to prevent such embolic events is anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant in nonvalvular AF. Recently, left atrial appendage closure was proposed as an alternative to anticoagulant inpatient with high embolic risk and contraindication to anticoagulant therapy. Data from randomized trials were consistent with a non-inferiority of left atrial appendage closure in comparison to VKA in terms of stroke and cardiovascular death. However, despite improvements in procedure results and complications reduction, this invasive strategy has to be performed with optimal security as this strategy is a preventive treatment in high-risk patients. These improvements may allow an extension of indications of left atrial appendage closure to lower profile risk patients as an alternative to anticoagulant. Indeed, anticoagulant is a risky therapy with hemorrhagic events and observance is a real issue in an asymptomatic population. Finally, there is a lack of data in recent literature comparing left atrial appendage closure to direct oral anticoagulant, widely used in daily practice, as well as cost-effectiveness of this procedure in comparison to anticoagulant.

