Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

07:52
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
9.1K
Energy dissipation differs between females with and without chronic ankle instability.
R S McCann1, M Terada2, K B Kosik3
1School of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
|November 8, 2017
Summary
Females with chronic ankle instability (CAI) show reduced ankle energy dissipation during single-leg landings compared to lateral ankle sprain (LAS) copers. This suggests a compensatory increase in hip and proximal joint contributions, highlighting a potential target for rehabilitation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Medicine
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is linked to altered energy absorption during movement.
- Previous research has not directly compared energy dissipation patterns in CAI to individuals who have recovered from lateral ankle sprains (LAS) and are considered copers.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted interventions for CAI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in relative sagittal plane energy dissipation during single-leg landings between female participants with CAI and LAS copers.
- To identify which joints (ankle, knee, hip, proximal) contribute differently to energy dissipation in these two groups.
Main Methods:
- 33 female participants (17 CAI, 16 LAS copers) performed single-leg landings.
- Sagittal plane kinematics and joint moments were recorded for the ankle, knee, and hip.
- Relative energy dissipation at each joint was calculated at 50, 100, 150, and 200 ms post-landing.
- Independent t-tests and Cohen's d effect sizes were used for statistical comparisons.
Main Results:
- The CAI group exhibited significantly lower relative energy dissipation from the ankle at 50, 100, and 150 ms post-landing compared to LAS copers.
- Conversely, the CAI group showed a greater contribution from the hip and proximal joints (knee and hip combined) to energy dissipation through 150 ms.
- These differences were statistically significant and indicated moderate to large effect sizes.
Conclusions:
- Females with CAI demonstrate a distinct energy dissipation strategy during single-leg landings, relying less on the ankle joint.
- This altered strategy involves increased reliance on proximal joints, particularly the hip.
- Therapeutic interventions for CAI should consider exercises aimed at improving ankle energy dissipation and potentially modifying proximal joint compensation patterns.

