Use of a child health surveillance instrument focusing on growth. A cross-sectional study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Erika Morganna Neves de Araujo1, Marcia Teles de Oliveira Gouveia2, Dixis Figueroa Pedraza3
1Master's Student, Nursing, Postgraduate Public Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande (PB), Brazil.
Insights
Child health handbooks are crucial for monitoring growth, but their use in Brazil showed significant data entry errors. Improved data quality was linked to larger healthcare teams, highlighting a need for better child health surveillance practices.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Child health handbooks are key indicators of healthcare quality.
- Effective use of these tools is essential for child health surveillance, particularly for monitoring growth.
- This study evaluated the utilization of child health surveillance tools, focusing on growth monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the use of child health surveillance tools by healthcare professionals.
- To assess the quality of data entry in child health handbooks, focusing on growth parameters.
- To analyze the association between handbook completion and sociodemographic characteristics.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted within the Family Health Strategy in two Brazilian municipalities.
- Data were collected from 321 children under five years old, including sociodemographic information from mothers.
- Analysis included growth charts, supplementation records, immunization schedules, and the association between handbook completion and sociodemographics.
Main Results:
- High frequencies of inadequate data entry were observed across all parameters, from 41.1% (weight-for-age) to 95.3% (BMI-for-age).
- Inadequate data entry was more prevalent in children aged 25 months and older.
- Fewer healthcare professionals in healthcare teams correlated with higher rates of inadequate data entry.
Conclusions:
- The utilization of child health handbooks for growth monitoring in the studied municipalities was found to be deficient.
- Improved data entry quality was associated with locations having larger healthcare teams.
- Enhancing the proper use of child health handbooks is critical for effective child health surveillance.
Background:
Proper use of a child health handbook is an important indicator of the quality of care provided to children at healthcare services. This study aimed to evaluate the use of child health surveillance tool (by health professionals?), especially focusing on growth.
Design And Setting:
Cross-sectional study carried out in the context of the Family Health Strategy in two municipalities in Paraíba, Brazil.
Methods:
Three hundred and twenty-one children under five years of age from areas covered by health workers were included in the study. Mothers answered a questionnaire asking for information on sociodemographic characteristics. Growth charts, records of iron and vitamin A supplementation and notes on immunization schedules registered in the instrument were analyzed. In the case of children for whom the third version of the child health handbook was used, the association between completion of this handbook and sociodemographic characteristics was analyzed.
Results:
All the parameters studied showed high frequencies of inadequate data entry, ranging from 41.1% for the weight-versus- age chart to 95.3% for the body mass index-versus-age chart. Higher frequency of inadequate data entry was found among children aged 25 months and over and among those living in areas of these municipalities with minimal numbers of professionals in the healthcare teams.
Conclusions:
The use of a child health handbook to monitor children's growth in the municipalities studied appeared to be faulty. Data entry to this instrument was better at locations with larger healthcare teams.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Longitudinal Studies
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Cross-Sectional Research
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

