Mechanical Thrombectomy for Middle Cerebral Artery Division Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hisham Salahuddin1, Aixa Espinosa1, Mark Buehler2

  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA.

Interventional Neurology
|November 10, 2017
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for M2 middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions shows comparable safety and clinical outcomes to M1 MCA occlusions. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings for M2 occlusions.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Interventional Neurology
  • Vascular Neurology

Background:

  • Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for M2 middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions is underrepresented in recent trials.
  • Treatment approaches for M2 MCA occlusions remain heterogeneous.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze 90-day outcomes for patients undergoing MT for M2 MCA occlusions.
  • To compare outcomes of MT for M2 MCA occlusions with M1 MCA occlusions.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
  • Searched five clinical databases up to September 2016.
  • Included studies reporting 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores for M2 MCA occlusions with an M1 MCA control group.

Main Results:

  • Six studies included 1,461 patients (M1=1,203, M2=258).
  • No significant differences found in good clinical outcomes (1.10 [0.83-1.44]), excellent outcomes (1.07 [0.65-1.79]), mortality (0.85 [0.58-1.24]), recanalization (1.06 [0.32-3.48]), or hemorrhage (1.19 [0.61-2.30]).

Conclusions:

  • MT of M2 MCA occlusions is as safe as MT of M1 MCA occlusions.
  • Clinical outcomes and hemorrhagic complications are comparable between M1 and M2 MCA occlusions.
  • Randomized clinical trials are necessary to evaluate MT impact in M2 occlusions due to differing natural histories.

Related Concept Videos