Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

05:30
Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
Published on: October 31, 2025
264
Gastrectomy with Extended Lymphadenectomy: a North American Perspective
Alexandre Gosselin-Tardif1, Jessica Lie2, Ioana Nicolau3
1Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. alexandre.gosselin-tardif@mail.mcgill.ca.
Summary
Extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer is safe and effective in North America. This oncologic procedure shows equivalent complication rates and superior lymph node yield compared to D1 dissection.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Gastric cancer surgery often involves lymphadenectomy to remove cancerous lymph nodes.
- Extended (D2) lymphadenectomy has demonstrated oncologic benefits in East Asian studies.
- Western centers have hesitated to adopt D2 dissection due to concerns about morbidity and mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in a high-volume North American center.
- To compare the outcomes of D2 dissection versus traditional D1 dissection in gastric cancer patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of a prospectively entered database of gastrectomy for cancer patients (2005-2016) at a North American referral center.
- Inclusion criteria excluded wedge resections, thoracoabdominal approaches, emergency surgeries, palliative operations, and non-adenocarcinoma cases.
- Data analysis compared postoperative complications, anastomotic leaks, mortality, pathological stage, lymph node yield, and complete resection rates between D1 and D2 groups.
Main Results:
- Of 175 eligible patients, 141 (80%) underwent D2 dissection. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications (44% D1 vs. 42% D2), anastomotic leaks (6% D1 vs. 5% D2), or 30-day mortality (6% D1 vs. 2% D2).
- D2 dissection was associated with higher pathological stage (72% > stage 1 vs. 38% > stage 1) and greater lymph node yield (median 30 vs. 14).
- The complete resection (R0) rate was similar between D1 (98%) and D2 (92%) groups. Laparoscopic D2 dissection resulted in shorter hospital stays (6 vs. 9 days) with equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open D2.
Conclusions:
- D2 lymphadenectomy, performed via open or laparoscopic approaches, is a safe and effective oncologic procedure for gastric cancer in high-volume North American centers.
- The study supports D2 dissection, demonstrating equivalent complication rates and superior lymph node yield compared to D1 dissection.
- Laparoscopic D2 dissection offers potential benefits, including reduced length of stay, while maintaining oncologic efficacy.
