Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Comparison of 4 Cardiac Risk Calculators in Predicting Postoperative Cardiac Complications After Noncardiac
Steven L Cohn1, Nerea Fernandez Ros2
1Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Medical Consultation Service, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida.
This study compared cardiac risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications. The myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest calculator appears most reliable for identifying high-risk patients needing further cardiac testing.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Perioperative Medicine
- Surgical Risk Assessment
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest (MICA), and American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) calculators for risk assessment.
- No published data directly compare the performance of these risk calculators.
- This study addresses the need for comparative data on the predictive accuracy of these tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of RCRI, MICA, and ACS-NSQIP calculators in predicting postoperative cardiac complications.
- To evaluate the accuracy of these calculators in a cohort undergoing select surgical procedures across various risk categories.
- To assess predictive performance during hospitalization and up to 30 days post-operation.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 663 patients undergoing select surgical procedures was studied.
- Performance of RCRI, MICA, and ACS-NSQIP calculators was compared.
- Cardiac complications, including myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest, were tracked during hospitalization and 30 days post-operation.
Main Results:
- Overall cardiac complications occurred in 2.1% of patients (14/663), with 11 during hospitalization.
- Myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest occurred in only 0.45% of patients (3/663).
- All calculators performed well within their original study settings but showed reduced accuracy when applied differently; MICA was most reliable for identifying high-risk patients.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated risk calculators are useful for identifying low-risk patients who may not require further cardiac testing.
- The myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest calculator demonstrated the highest reliability in selecting patients at higher risk for cardiac complications.
- Direct comparison of calculators is challenging due to differing risk factors, outcomes, and observation durations.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...