Quality assessment of atopic dermatitis clinical practice guidelines in 18 years

Luz de María Díaz Granados1,2, María Adelaida Quijano1,2, Paola Andrea Ramírez1,2

  • 1Group of Investigative Dermatology (GRID), Universidad de Antioquia, Carrera 25 A # 1 A Sur 45, Of 2026, Torre Médica El Tesoro, Medellín, Colombia.

Insights

Clinical practice guidelines for pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) were evaluated using AGREE II. While most domains scored highly, applicability needs improvement for better real-world patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory skin condition significantly impacting quality of life, especially in children.
  • Treatment decisions for AD often vary due to specialist experience, highlighting the need for standardized guidance.
  • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to standardize care based on scientific evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for atopic dermatitis in patients aged 18 years and younger.
  • To assess the adherence of these guidelines to the AGREE II instrument's rigorous development standards.

Main Methods:

  • Ten clinical practice guidelines for pediatric atopic dermatitis were systematically reviewed.
  • Three independent reviewers assessed each guideline using the six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.
  • Domains assessed included scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, and editorial independence.

Main Results:

  • Most evaluated clinical practice guidelines for pediatric atopic dermatitis achieved high scores across several AGREE II domains.
  • The 'applicability' domain received notably lower scores compared to other domains.
  • Consistent high scores were observed in scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, and editorial independence.

Conclusions:

  • Existing clinical practice guidelines for pediatric atopic dermatitis are generally well-developed according to AGREE II standards.
  • Future guideline development should prioritize enhancing the 'applicability' domain to improve real-world implementation.
  • Recommendations for future atopic dermatitis CPGs should focus on identifying facilitators and barriers to the application of guideline recommendations.