Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Acoustic environment identification by Kullback-Leibler divergence
G Delgado-Gutiérrez1, F Rodríguez-Santos1, O Jiménez-Ramírez1
1ESIME Culhuacan, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Santa Ana 1000, 04430 CDMX, Mexico.
This study introduces a forensic method to identify the origin of digital audio recordings by analyzing noise components. It estimates a likelihood rate based on additive noise patterns to pinpoint the most probable recording location.
Area of Science:
- Digital Forensics
- Acoustic Analysis
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Digital audio recordings contain multiplicative (device-related) and additive (environment-related) noise.
- Distinguishing the origin of audio recordings is crucial in forensic investigations.
- Existing methods may not sufficiently differentiate between recording environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a forensic methodology for determining the probable recording location of disputed digital audio.
- To estimate a likelihood rate to assess the plausibility of different recording environments.
Main Methods:
- Analyzing additive noise as an external feature indicative of the recording environment.
- Estimating additive noise using the Geometric Approach to Spectral Subtraction (GA-SS) filter.
- Calculating a likelihood rate via Kullback-Leibler divergence for statistical comparison of noise distributions.
Main Results:
- The methodology provides a quantitative likelihood rate to support the determination of the recording place.
- Statistical comparison of additive noise probability distribution functions aids in identifying the most plausible location.
- Reference recordings from potential locations are used for comparative analysis.
Conclusions:
- The proposed forensic methodology effectively utilizes additive noise analysis to determine the probable origin of digital audio recordings.
- This approach offers a robust tool for forensic audio investigations by quantifying environmental acoustic signatures.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Sound Intensity Level
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

