Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Chelation Therapy as a Cardiovascular Therapeutic Strategy: the Rationale and the Data in Review
Roy O Mathew1, Joshua Schulman-Marcus2,3, Elizabeth L Nichols4,5,6
1WJB Dorn VA Medical Center, and University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
Insights
Chelation therapy for coronary artery disease shows some results but lacks sufficient evidence for routine use. Further research is needed to understand its cardiovascular benefits and risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Toxicology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Chelation therapy, primarily for heavy metal detoxification, is controversially applied to coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Patient interest persists despite limited clinical evidence supporting its efficacy in cardiovascular conditions.
- Understanding heavy metal toxicity's cardiovascular impact is crucial for evaluating chelation therapy's role.
Purpose of the Study:
- To appraise the evidence for chelation therapy in treating cardiovascular disease.
- To contextualize its use by examining heavy metal toxicity and cardiovascular health.
- To review clinical trial data on chelation therapy for mitigating heavy metal-related cardiovascular burden.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical evidence linking heavy metal toxicity to cardiovascular disease.
- Analysis of available clinical trial data, including the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT).
- Assessment of chelation therapy's potential benefits and harms in the context of CAD.
Main Results:
- The first Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) yielded some significant findings but did not provide conclusive evidence for routine use.
- Limitations in the TACT trial necessitate further investigation.
- Ongoing research, including a second TACT trial, highlights continued interest and debate.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence is insufficient to recommend routine chelation therapy for coronary artery disease.
- Further comprehensive research is essential to determine the true efficacy and safety of chelation therapy for cardiovascular conditions.
- The medical community must address patient pursuit of unproven therapies by thoroughly evaluating their potential impact.
Abstract:
Chelation therapy, typically used to remove heavy metal toxins, has also been controversially used as a treatment for coronary artery disease. The first Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) aimed to provide evidence on chelation therapy's potential for benefit or harm. Although TACT had some significant results, the trial does not provide enough evidence to recommend routine chelation therapy and has limitations. The second TACT was recently funded reigniting a discussion about the value of chelation therapy, its efficacy, and allocation of research resources. Despite limited evidence, patients continue to pursue chelation therapy as a treatment for coronary artery disease. As the medical community has a responsibility to understand all treatments patients pursue, it is important to comprehensively appraise chelation therapy for cardiovascular disease. Understanding the background of heavy metal toxicity, the putative target of chelation therapy, on the cardiovascular system is important to contextualize the role of chelation therapy in cardiovascular disease prevention. We review the clinical evidence of heavy metal toxicity and cardiovascular disease, and available clinical trial data on use of chelation therapy to minimize the cardiovascular burden of heavy metal toxicity.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
