Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

An In Vitro Model of a Parallel-Plate Perfusion System to Study Bacterial Adherence to Graft Tissues
Published on: January 7, 2019
Temporal changes in infective endocarditis guidelines during the last 12 years: High-level evidence needed
Lauge Østergaard1, Nana Valeur2, Henning Bundgaard1
1Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
The number of infective endocarditis (IE) guideline recommendations has surged without a rise in evidence quality. More clinical studies are crucial to enhance the evidence base for IE guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Guidelines
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex cardiovascular disease with evolving clinical management guidelines.
- The American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have significantly updated their IE guidelines over the past decade.
- An analysis of the evidence supporting these guideline changes is warranted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the changes in the evidence base supporting infective endocarditis (IE) guidelines from the AHA and ESC over time.
- To assess the evolution of the number of recommendations and their corresponding levels of evidence (LOE) in IE guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of IE guidelines published by the AHA and ESC was conducted.
- Guidelines were grouped into three distinct time periods: 2004-2005, 2007-2009, and 2015.
- The number of recommendations, recommendation classes, and levels of evidence (A, B, C) were analyzed for changes across these periods.
Main Results:
- The total number of IE recommendations increased significantly, by 6.8-fold, from 37 to 253 between the first and third periods.
- There was a statistically significant decrease in Level of Evidence A recommendations (from 20.0% to 1.6%) and a significant increase in Level of Evidence C recommendations (from 31.4% to 53.0%).
- Level of Evidence B recommendations showed a non-significant increase (from 48.6% to 45.9%) despite a 6.8-fold rise in their absolute number.
Conclusions:
- Infective endocarditis guideline recommendations have expanded substantially over the last decade without a commensurate increase in the quality of supporting evidence.
- The findings underscore a critical need for more robust clinical research to strengthen the evidence base for IE guidelines.
- Future guideline development should prioritize studies that yield higher levels of evidence to ensure optimal patient care.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
