Temporal changes in infective endocarditis guidelines during the last 12 years: High-level evidence needed
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

An In Vitro Model of a Parallel-Plate Perfusion System to Study Bacterial Adherence to Graft Tissues
Published on: January 7, 2019
Lauge Østergaard1, Nana Valeur2, Henning Bundgaard1
1Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Insights
The number of infective endocarditis (IE) guideline recommendations has surged without a rise in evidence quality. More clinical studies are crucial to enhance the evidence base for IE guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Guidelines
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex cardiovascular disease with evolving clinical management guidelines.
- The American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have significantly updated their IE guidelines over the past decade.
- An analysis of the evidence supporting these guideline changes is warranted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the changes in the evidence base supporting infective endocarditis (IE) guidelines from the AHA and ESC over time.
- To assess the evolution of the number of recommendations and their corresponding levels of evidence (LOE) in IE guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of IE guidelines published by the AHA and ESC was conducted.
- Guidelines were grouped into three distinct time periods: 2004-2005, 2007-2009, and 2015.
- The number of recommendations, recommendation classes, and levels of evidence (A, B, C) were analyzed for changes across these periods.
Main Results:
- The total number of IE recommendations increased significantly, by 6.8-fold, from 37 to 253 between the first and third periods.
- There was a statistically significant decrease in Level of Evidence A recommendations (from 20.0% to 1.6%) and a significant increase in Level of Evidence C recommendations (from 31.4% to 53.0%).
- Level of Evidence B recommendations showed a non-significant increase (from 48.6% to 45.9%) despite a 6.8-fold rise in their absolute number.
Conclusions:
- Infective endocarditis guideline recommendations have expanded substantially over the last decade without a commensurate increase in the quality of supporting evidence.
- The findings underscore a critical need for more robust clinical research to strengthen the evidence base for IE guidelines.
- Future guideline development should prioritize studies that yield higher levels of evidence to ensure optimal patient care.
Background:
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex disease necessitating extensive clinical guidelines. The guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have been markedly extended during the last 12 years. We examined the evidence base for these changes.
Methods:
IE guidelines published by AHA and ESC were reviewed. We categorized and combined guidelines into 3 time periods: (1) 2004 (AHA) and 2005 (ESC), (2) 2007 (AHA) and 2009 (ESC), and (3) 2015 (AHA) and 2015 (ESC). Number of recommendations, classes of recommendations (I, II, or III), and levels of evidence (LOE) (A, B, or C) were assessed and the changes over time.
Results:
From period 1 to period 3, we found a statistically significant increase in total number of IE recommendations from 37 to 253 (P<.01), a 6.8-fold increase. There were a significant decrease in LOE A (from 7 [20.0%] in period 1 to 4 [1.6%] in period 3, P<.0001, a 57% decrease), a nonsignificant decrease in LOE B recommendations (from 17 [48.6%] in period 1 to 115 [45.9%] in period 3, P=.29, a 6.8-fold increase), and a significant increase in LOE C recommendations (from 11 [31.4%] in period 1 to 134 [53.0%] in period 3, P=.02, a 12.2-fold increase).
Conclusions:
The number of IE guideline recommendations has increased 6- to 7-fold during the last decade without a corresponding increase in evidence. These results highlight the strong need for more clinical studies to improve the level of evidence in IE guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
