Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Treatment strategies in coronary microvascular dysfunction: A systematic review of interventional studies
Hannah E Suhrs1, Marie M Michelsen1, Eva Prescott1
1Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Insights
Current treatments for coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) lack guideline recommendations due to insufficient evidence. Larger, well-designed trials are needed to establish effective, individualized therapies for this condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is linked to numerous diseases and predicts morbidity/mortality.
- Despite its significance, evidence-based treatment guidelines are absent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improving coronary perfusion in CMD.
- To assess the efficacy of various diagnostic techniques for evaluating coronary microvascular function.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 80 studies meeting inclusion criteria, sourced from 4485 records.
- Included studies encompassed diverse designs (randomized, non-randomized) and cardiac conditions.
- Interventions were evaluated using imaging modalities like IC Doppler, TTDE, PET, CMRI, and echocardiography.
Main Results:
- Studies were generally small and methodologically heterogeneous, with few placebo-controlled trials.
- While some interventions showed promise, none were sufficiently documented for broad recommendation.
- No specific treatment could be recommended for any patient group based on current evidence.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for larger, well-designed clinical trials in CMD.
- Future research should stratify patients by pathogenic mechanisms to explore individualized treatment efficacy.
Abstract:
CMD has been associated with a wide spectrum of diseases and conditions, and it has proven to be a strong prognostic marker of morbidity and mortality. Despite increased attention, guideline-based treatment recommendations are lacking. We performed a systematic review of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve coronary perfusion, assessed by IC Doppler, TTDE, PET, CMRI, transthoracic contrast perfusion echocardiography, and dilution techniques. No restrictions were made regarding the study design (randomized, placebo-controlled/randomized with active comparators/nonrandomized with or without a control group), the cardiac condition studied, or the coronary microvascular function at baseline. An electronic database search yielded 4485 records of which 80 studies met our inclusion criteria. Included studies were sorted according to intervention and study design. Studies were small and heterogeneous in methodology, and only few were placebo-controlled. Although some treatments looked promising, we found that no specific treatment was sufficiently well documented to be recommended in any patient groups. There is a need for larger well-designed clinical trials, and we suggest that future studies stratify study populations according to pathogenic mechanisms, thereby investigating whether an individualized treatment approach would be more successful.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

