Reliability of clinically feasible dual-task tests: Expanded timed get up and go test as a motor task on young...

Dual-Task testing has been reported to have a higher sensitivity to deficits associated with concussion; however, the feasibility as a clinical or field test is questionable due to the requirements of laboratory-based equipment. With an overarching goal of exploration of clinically feasible Dual-Task testing options, the specific aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the reliability of Dual-Task testing methods using the Expanded Timed Get-Up-and-Go (ETGUG) paired with Backward Digit Recall (BDR), Serial Seven (SS), and Auditory Pure Switch Task (APST), and 2) to determine the effects of Dual-Task testing on motor and cognitive performance in healthy college-aged individuals. Fifty-four healthy young adults completed two separate testing sessions, which consisted of Single-Task tests in a randomized order followed by 3 pairs of Dual-Task tests in a randomized order. Test-retest reliability for ETGUG time to completion was excellent for all Single- and Dual-Task conditions (ICC 0.89-0.92); however, ETGUG_BDR and ETGUG_SS were associated with learning effects (p=0.002 and 0.007, respectively). Test-retest reliability for Response Rate of the cognitive tasks was lower than those of motor task and all outcomes were associated with learning effects. The completion time of the ETGUG_APST pair indicated excellent reliability with no learning effect. Performance level declined in all tasks under Dual-Task conditions compared to Single-Task; however, motor tasks showed larger deficits indicating the prioritization of the cognitive task compared to the motor task.