Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Evaluation of Abortion Stigma in the Workforce: Development of the Revised Abortion Providers Stigma Scale
Lisa A Martin1, Jane A Hassinger2, Meghan Seewald3
1University of Michigan, Women's and Gender Studies Program & Department of Health & Human Services, Dearborn, Michigan.
Objectives:
We report on the development of a scale measuring abortion providers' experiences of stigma.
Study Design:
Using previous measures, qualitative data, and expert review, we created a 49-item question pool. We administered questions to 315 abortion providers before participation in the Providers Share Workshop. We explored the factor structure and item quality using exploratory factor analysis. We assessed reliability using Cronbach's alpha. To test construct validity, we calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients between the stigma scales, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the K10 measure of psychological distress. We used Stata SE/12.0 for analyses.
Results:
Factor analysis revealed a 35-item, five-factor model: worries about disclosure, internalized states, social judgment, social isolation, and discrimination (Cronbach's alphas 0.79-0.94). Our stigma measure was correlated with psychological distress (r = 0.40; p < .001), and with Maslach Burnout Inventory's emotional exhaustion (r = 0.27; p < .001), and depersonalization (0.23; p < .001) subscales, and was inversely correlated with Maslach Burnout Inventory's personal accomplishment subscale (r = -0.15; p < .05).
Conclusions:
Psychometric analysis of this scale reveals that it is a reliable and valid tool for measuring stigma in abortion providers, and may be helpful in evaluating stigma reduction programs.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

