Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
Published on: October 26, 2017
Replication of Mini-Sentinel Study Assessing Mirabegron and Cardiovascular Risk in Non-Mini-Sentinel Databases
Jason C Simeone1, Beth L Nordstrom2, Kwame Appenteng3
1Real-World Evidence, Evidera, 500 Totten Pond Road, Fifth Floor, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. jason.simeone@evidera.com.
Background:
In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated a prospective routine surveillance using the Mini-Sentinel (M-S) program to assess potential signals of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke with use of mirabegron, indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), compared with oxybutynin.
Purpose:
To replicate the FDA M-S analysis of mirabegron using datasets that did not contribute to the M-S program.
Methods:
IMS PharMetrics Plus and Truven MarketScan claims data from 2012-2015 were converted to the M-S Common Data Model. New and non-new users of mirabegron and oxybutynin were analyzed per the publicly available M-S protocol, and propensity score-matched 1:1 using the M-S PROMPT 2 module. Incidence rates (IR) were calculated per 1000 person-years (PY). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mirabegron versus oxybutynin were calculated using Cox regression models.
Results:
In PharMetrics, 12,429 new mirabegron users and 61,548 new oxybutynin users were identified. The aHR was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.33-1.37) for AMI (mirabegron IR 4.4/1000 PY), and 0.62 (95% CI 0.34-1.13) for stroke (mirabegron IR 6.3/1000 PY). In MarketScan, 17,182 new mirabegron users and 63,962 new oxybutynin users were identified. The aHR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.17-1.95) for AMI, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.30-1.62) for stroke; IRs were similar to those from PharMetrics. Neither dataset suggested an increased risk of AMI or stroke associated with mirabegron in non-new users.
Conclusions:
Using the publicly-available M-S protocol and analysis programs with alternative (non M-S) data sources, no statistically significant increased risk of AMI or stroke was found among new or non-new users of mirabegron compared with oxybutynin. These findings were consistent with the FDA M-S mirabegron study.
Insights
This study found no increased risk of heart attack or stroke with mirabegron compared to oxybutynin for overactive bladder treatment. Findings were consistent across multiple datasets, supporting safety for both new and existing users.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance and drug safety research.
- Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event analysis in medication users.
Background:
- The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated surveillance for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke risks associated with mirabegron for overactive bladder (OAB).
- The Mini-Sentinel (M-S) program monitored mirabegron use against oxybutynin, a common OAB treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To independently replicate the FDA's Mini-Sentinel analysis on mirabegron safety.
- To utilize external healthcare claims datasets not included in the original M-S program.
Main Methods:
- Two large claims databases (IMS PharMetrics Plus, Truven MarketScan) were converted to the M-S Common Data Model.
- Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to compare new and non-new users of mirabegron and oxybutynin.
- Incidence rates (IR) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for AMI and stroke were calculated using Cox regression.
Main Results:
- In PharMetrics, adjusted hazard ratios for AMI and stroke with mirabegron versus oxybutynin were 0.67 (95% CI 0.33-1.37) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.34-1.13), respectively.
- MarketScan data showed similar adjusted hazard ratios: 0.57 (95% CI 0.17-1.95) for AMI and 0.69 (95% CI 0.30-1.62) for stroke.
- No increased risk of AMI or stroke was observed for mirabegron in non-new users in either dataset.
Conclusions:
- Independent analysis using non-M-S data sources and the M-S protocol found no statistically significant increased risk of AMI or stroke with mirabegron.
- These findings align with the original FDA M-S study, suggesting a consistent safety profile for mirabegron compared to oxybutynin.
- The study supports the safety of mirabegron for both new and non-new users in the context of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
