Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Health System Creation and Integration at a Health Sciences University: A Five-Year Follow-up
Catherine P Slade1, Ricardo Azziz, Steven Levin
1Catherine P. Slade, PhD, associate professor of management, James M. Hull College of Business, Augusta University, Georgia; Ricardo Azziz, MD, chief officer of academic health and hospital affairs, the State University of New York System Administration, Albany; Steven Levin, director, Chartis Group, New York, New York; Gretchen B. Caughman, PhD, executive vice president of academic affairs and provost, Augusta University; David S. Hefner, vice president for health affairs, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; Kimberly V. Halbur, EdD, associate dean for student and multicultural affairs, the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University; Martha S. Tingen, PhD, professor and Charles W. Linder Endowed Chair in Pediatrics, the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University; and Susan James, JD, vice president and chief legal officer, WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Executive Summary:
Shifting healthcare market forces and regulation have exerted near-constant pressure on U.S. academic health centers (AHCs) attempting to successfully execute their traditional tripartite mission. A governance structure and organizational alignment that works well under one set of conditions is rarely optimal when conditions change. Thus, the degree and type of alignment of an AHC's clinical, educational, and faculty practice organizations have changed regularly within the sector, typically landing near one end or the other on a continuum from fully aligned with centralized governance to largely independent with separate governance. The authors examine the case of Georgia Regents University and Health System in this context. In step with industry trends, the institution's governance structure swung from fully aligned/centralized governance in the early 1990s to essentially separate and decentralized by 2000. In 2010, the Georgia Regents University organizations achieved rapid realignment by creating a governance structure of sufficient strength and flexibility to absorb and adjust to continuing external upheaval. The hospitals, clinics, and physician-faculty practice group were combined into one integrated health system, then aligned with the university to form the state's only public AHC under aligned, but distinct, corporate and management structures. The years since reorganization have seen significant growth in patient volumes and complexity, improved service quality, and enhanced faculty physician satisfaction, while also significantly increasing economic contributions from the health system to the academic mission. This case study offers observations and lessons learned that may be useful to other higher education institutions considering reorganization.
Related Concept Videos
Integrated Healthcare System
Secondary Healthcare System
Tertiary Healthcare System
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:

